1990
DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90725-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shadow method for sun protection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of 2.7 in Table 3 for the mean normalized SPF at a zenith angle of 45 degrees is good justification for the rule of thumb for sun protection that the author proposed in a popular science article (Holloway, 1987) and in The Lancet (Holloway, 1990): "When your shadow is shorter than you are tall, the sun is much more likely to bum you than at other times." Shadows on a horizontal surface outdoors in the sun are shorter than the objects casting them when the solar zenith angle is less than 45 degrees.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of 2.7 in Table 3 for the mean normalized SPF at a zenith angle of 45 degrees is good justification for the rule of thumb for sun protection that the author proposed in a popular science article (Holloway, 1987) and in The Lancet (Holloway, 1990): "When your shadow is shorter than you are tall, the sun is much more likely to bum you than at other times." Shadows on a horizontal surface outdoors in the sun are shorter than the objects casting them when the solar zenith angle is less than 45 degrees.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shadow rule from the period before the UVI was instituted suggests more than 45° of sun elevation as an indication for the application of protective measures. The rule is based on UV radiation measurements, but total ozone column values were not considered (8–10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%