2021
DOI: 10.3390/plants10040809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shade Avoidance and Light Foraging of a Clonal Woody Species, Pachysandra terminalis

Abstract: (1) Background: A central subject in clonal plant ecology is to elucidate the mechanism by which clones forage resources in heterogeneous environments. Compared with studies conducted in laboratories or experimental gardens, studies on light foraging of forest woody clonal plants in their natural habitats are limited. (2) Methods: We investigated wild populations of an evergreen clonal understory shrub, Japanese pachysandra (Pachysandra terminalis Siebold & Zucc.), in two cool-temperate forests in Japan. (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(181 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structure of a shoot, including size variation and arrangement of leaves, determines the light-harvesting efficiency of plants ( Givnish, 1984 ; Valladares and Brites, 2004 ; Pearcy et al , 2005 ; Smith et al , 2017 ; Olson et al , 2018 ; Koyama et al , 2020 ; Iwabe et al , 2021 ). If a shoot is to minimize the cost of current light harvesting, the optimal solution derived by Givnish (1982) is to have a single large leaf with no investment in the stem (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of a shoot, including size variation and arrangement of leaves, determines the light-harvesting efficiency of plants ( Givnish, 1984 ; Valladares and Brites, 2004 ; Pearcy et al , 2005 ; Smith et al , 2017 ; Olson et al , 2018 ; Koyama et al , 2020 ; Iwabe et al , 2021 ). If a shoot is to minimize the cost of current light harvesting, the optimal solution derived by Givnish (1982) is to have a single large leaf with no investment in the stem (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond its bioenergetic role, photic exposure exerts a direct influence on morphological development, governing the leaf movements and density of branching, the morphology and anatomy of foliage, and the chronobiology of anthesis. Diverse photic parameters, including spectral composition, photon flux density, and photoperiodicity, intersect to form a delicate and precise regulatory matrix [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants perceive low photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) as an early signal of neighbor competition through phytochrome photoreceptors, which in turn induces the shade-avoidance responses (SAR) [8,9]. Generally, a SAR involves the elongation of internodes, reduction in branches, or decrease in leaf number, chlorophyll a/b ratio, or photosynthetic rate that leads to the reallocation of assimilates to stem elongation instead of root and leaf growth, and therefore causes significant decrease in yield [10][11][12][13][14]. These responses are regulated by phytochromes (Phy A-E) [15], which sense decreases in the red/far-red ratio in dense populations and initiate the SAR [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%