2020
DOI: 10.5120/ijca2020920911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SHA-256 in Parallel Blockchain Technology: Storing Land Related Documents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding storing spatial data and BCT, one proposition was made in [52] where it is suggested to divide the surface of Earth to 3m-by-3m squares with unique IDs that will represent a unit of transactions. In [53] it is concluded that it is possible to store land administration data in parallel blockchains. This is interesting because BCT is not considered suitable for storing a high volume of data, such as spatial data.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding storing spatial data and BCT, one proposition was made in [52] where it is suggested to divide the surface of Earth to 3m-by-3m squares with unique IDs that will represent a unit of transactions. In [53] it is concluded that it is possible to store land administration data in parallel blockchains. This is interesting because BCT is not considered suitable for storing a high volume of data, such as spatial data.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other participants can then verify the validity of the block by checking its association with the previous block and confirming that it satisfies the network's required properties. Consensus is achieved when all participants have the same set of blocks, forming the longest blockchain [9]. Hashes are also instrumental in verifying data integrity and facilitating the cryptographic signature process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%