2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

sgRNAcas9: A Software Package for Designing CRISPR sgRNA and Evaluating Potential Off-Target Cleavage Sites

Abstract: Although the CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA system efficiently cleaves intracellular DNA at desired target sites, major concerns remain on potential “off-target” cleavage that may occur throughout the whole genome. In order to improve CRISPR-Cas9 specificity for targeted genome editing and transcriptional control, we describe a bioinformatics tool “sgRNAcas9”, which is a software package developed for fast design of CRISPR sgRNA with minimized off-target effects. This package consists of programs to perform a search for CR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
247
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 337 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
247
0
Order By: Relevance
“…caltech.edu) to confirm cn RNA expression of the putative target regions 7,10 . Secondly, we searched both sense and antisense strands of the cn exon sequences of interest for the presence of the NGG protospacer-adjacent motifs (PAMs) utilizing CHOPCHOP v2 software 29 and local sgRNA Cas9 package 30 . Thirdly, to minimize potential off-target effects, we confirmed specificity of our sgRNAs using publicly available bioinformatic tools 31 and selected the most specific sgRNAs within our specified target region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…caltech.edu) to confirm cn RNA expression of the putative target regions 7,10 . Secondly, we searched both sense and antisense strands of the cn exon sequences of interest for the presence of the NGG protospacer-adjacent motifs (PAMs) utilizing CHOPCHOP v2 software 29 and local sgRNA Cas9 package 30 . Thirdly, to minimize potential off-target effects, we confirmed specificity of our sgRNAs using publicly available bioinformatic tools 31 and selected the most specific sgRNAs within our specified target region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, even with the high specificity of the techniques, the nuclease might still cleave additional sites that are similar to the target sites potentially causing unwanted mutations, known as off-target effects, which is one of the issues of SDNs in general and should be carefully monitored Fichtner et al, 2014;Petersen and Niemann, 2015b). Software tools are being developed to minimize the probability of off-target effects (Naito et al, 2014;Xie et al, 2014), however, the production of an organism with the desired mutation might still require a screening process to eliminate undesirable traits. Nonetheless, compared to conventional transgenesis or induced mutagenesis, the SDNs provide a much less laborious and more straightforward approach (Lusser and Davies, 2013;Araki and Ishii, 2015).…”
Section: " 42mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with the increased precision of the SDN techniques, unwanted mutations should occur much less often compared to transgenesis or induced mutagenesis Ribarits et al, 2014;Rinaldo and Ayliffe, 2015). The occurrence of off-target effects can further be reduced by improving binding specificity, use of software tools or by in vitro selection of the most appropriate SDN (Hartung and Schiemann, 2014;Naito et al, 2014;Xie et al, 2014). With the advances in whole-genome sequencing, detection of the organisms carrying unwanted genome changes is also becoming more straightforward Araki and Ishii, 2015).…”
Section: " 51mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the Cas9 and sgRNA1 or sgRNA2 constructs were electroporated into mouse fibroblast NIH-3T3 cells. And 72 h after eletroporation, T7E1 assay [13] was carried out to evaluate the issue of off-target. Among the 10 most likely off-targeting sites for both sgRNAs (Supplementary Table S3), T7E1 assay revealed no off-target digestion by Cas9 (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Crispr/mentioning
confidence: 99%