2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10800-008-9492-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SFG and DFG investigation of Au(111), Au(210), polycrystalline Au, Au–Cu and Au–Ag–Cu electrodes in contact with aqueous solutions containing KCN and 4-cyanopyridine

Abstract: We report on potential-dependent in situ SFG and DFG spectroscopy carried out at Au(111), Au (210), polycrystalline Au, Au-Cu and Au-Ag-Cu electrodes in contact with aqueous solutions containing CN -and 4-cyanopyridine (4CP). Spectroelectrochemical work was complemented by cyclic voltammetry. The chief stress has been placed on systematising and quantifying the interaction between 4CP and CN -and the attending effects on the vibrational and electronic structures of the interface. The voltammetric behaviour of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NR contribution from gold is much larger than that from other metal electrodes (Ag, Co, Ni, Pt) due to the interband transition of Au lies in the visible range. Tadjeddine et al systematically modelled the metal surface contribution [26] (and references therein), and showed the difference between the phases of the NR contributions of SFG and DFG (difference frequency generation) spectroscopy of electrochemistry interfaces [26][27][28]. The electrode NR contribution is potential dependent and drastically depending on the nature of the electrode material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NR contribution from gold is much larger than that from other metal electrodes (Ag, Co, Ni, Pt) due to the interband transition of Au lies in the visible range. Tadjeddine et al systematically modelled the metal surface contribution [26] (and references therein), and showed the difference between the phases of the NR contributions of SFG and DFG (difference frequency generation) spectroscopy of electrochemistry interfaces [26][27][28]. The electrode NR contribution is potential dependent and drastically depending on the nature of the electrode material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employed free CN¯-based aqueous electrolytes: a Zn(II)-cyanocomplex bath containing free CN¯ for the electrodeposition studies and a CN¯ solution for adsorption investigations on Au and Zn. The CN¯ solutions were obtained by dissolving 25 mM KCN and 0.1 M NaClO4 in milli-Q water or by prolonged cathodic reaction of 25 mM 4-cyanopyridine in the same perchlorate supporting electrolyte [17]. The cyanocomplex bath was obtained by dissolving 5 mM ZnO to the KCN solution, whereby the Zn(II) cyanocomplex forms spontaneously.…”
Section: Electrolytesmentioning
confidence: 99%