2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexy voices – no choices: male song in noise fails to attract females

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traffic noise is known to mask acoustic signals as well as cues used by a wide range of taxa, including birds, mammals, insects and fish [53,[57][58][59], a process we refer to as unimodal interference (figure 2). Anthropogenic noise can also result in multimodal interference, for example, when sounds induce surface vibrations on a leaf or a water surface, resulting in covarying noise levels that may hamper the use of signals and cues in the acoustic and seismic domain at the same time ( figure 2, [51]).…”
Section: (B) Multimodal Interference By Anthropogenic Sensory Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traffic noise is known to mask acoustic signals as well as cues used by a wide range of taxa, including birds, mammals, insects and fish [53,[57][58][59], a process we refer to as unimodal interference (figure 2). Anthropogenic noise can also result in multimodal interference, for example, when sounds induce surface vibrations on a leaf or a water surface, resulting in covarying noise levels that may hamper the use of signals and cues in the acoustic and seismic domain at the same time ( figure 2, [51]).…”
Section: (B) Multimodal Interference By Anthropogenic Sensory Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that this difference is related to a decrease in bird density close to the road where noise is highest, as it was found by a previous study in Carara in which bird density and bird species richness decreased with noise (Arévalo and Newhard, 2011). Noise may interfere with bird communication (Grade and Kathryn, 2016;Kleist et al, 2016), induce stress (Kight and Swaddle, 2011) and can alter mating and breeding processes (Reijnen et al, 1995;Schmidt, Morrison and Kunc, 2014). Thus, some species of forest birds may be forced to move away towards the inner forest to avoid the negative effects of road noise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the quality of a given signal is not necessarily positively correlated with intensity. In addition, further sound sources such as abiotic (Brumm and Slabbekoorn, 2005;Reichert and Ronacher, 2015) or even anthropogenic noise (Lampe et al, 2012(Lampe et al, , 2014Schmidt et al, 2014) may impede signal representation and recognition. Crickets, bushcrickets and grasshoppers are known to employ several processing tools to reduce the detrimental effects of masking and noise (Einhäupl et al, 2011;Schmidt and Römer, 2011;Neuhofer and Ronacher, 2012;Hildebrandt et al, 2015), most prominently by forward masking, selective attention, formation of acoustic hemispheres and stream segregation (Pollack, 1986;Schul and Sheridan, 2006;Triblehorn and Schul, 2009;Schmidt and Römer, 2011).…”
Section: Discussion Signal Representation and Cues For Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%