2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexually-Transmitted/Founder HIV-1 Cannot Be Directly Predicted from Plasma or PBMC-Derived Viral Quasispecies in the Transmitting Partner

Abstract: ObjectiveCharacterization of HIV-1 sequences in newly infected individuals is important for elucidating the mechanisms of viral sexual transmission. We report the identification of transmitted/founder viruses in eight pairs of HIV-1 sexually-infected patients enrolled at the time of primary infection (“recipients”) and their transmitting partners (“donors”).MethodsUsing a single genome-amplification approach, we compared quasispecies in donors and recipients on the basis of 316 and 376 C2V5 env sequences ampli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assumption of direct transmission of the mixed variants in subject 10BR_023RJ do not support the hypothesis of gatekeeping event that almost always selects for transmission of R5 over ×4 HIV-1 strains [ 44 ]. Indeed, there is no convincing evidence has yet been published to proof the lower transmissibility of ×4 viruses but available data support the idea that R5 or D/M infections could result from a stochastic process [ 45 , 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption of direct transmission of the mixed variants in subject 10BR_023RJ do not support the hypothesis of gatekeeping event that almost always selects for transmission of R5 over ×4 HIV-1 strains [ 44 ]. Indeed, there is no convincing evidence has yet been published to proof the lower transmissibility of ×4 viruses but available data support the idea that R5 or D/M infections could result from a stochastic process [ 45 , 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, neither study identified associations with particular STIs; they only observed associations with any vaginal/urethral discharges in the recipients [5] or when grouping together occurrences of a number of STIs [90]. Other studies were unable to observe this association [92, 93]. It is possible that these latter studies were underpowered to detect the association; perhaps they failed to have a sufficient number of cases of the particular STIs most responsible for the observed increased risk of multivariant transmission.…”
Section: Sexually Transmitted Infections and Risk Of Multivariant Tramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to study selection of the transmitted virus in detail, samples are taken from the donor blood as well as from the recipient blood. This is followed by subcloning and bulk sequencing [194, 195], single genome amplification (SGA)-based analysis [68, 93] or deep sequencing-based analysis [196]. Earlier studies of the T/F virus relied on collecting the sample material a few months following appearance of infection symptoms followed by bulk PCR-based methods, cloning, sequencing and phylogenetic analysis [27, 105, 110, 194, 197, 198] or heteroduplex tracking assay (HTA) [194, 197, 198].…”
Section: Impact Of Approaches Used To Study the Transmitted Virus Upomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loose association between viral phenotypes and improved transmission was also demonstrated by a study of molecular infectious clone [9]. In the absence of clear differences in infectivity, there is little hope for predicting which variant(s) in the donor will become the founder strain(s) in a new infection [10]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%