2013
DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexually dimorphic preference for altruism in the opposite sex according to recipient

Abstract: Sexual selection may affect human altruistic behaviour. Evolutionary psychology predicts that human mate preference reflects sexual selection. We investigated sex differences in preference for opposite-sex altruism according to recipient because the reasons for altruistic behaviour differ according to the relationship between actor and recipient. We employed the Self-Report Altruism Scale Distinguished by the Recipient, which was newly developed to evaluate altruism among Japanese undergraduates. We asked part… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not odd in East Asia. In Japanese undergraduates of both sexes, opposite-sex altruistic behaviours towards family members (rather than towards friends and strangers) were much preferred in LT relationships (Oda et al, 2013). In this study, females have not shown the preferences for altruistic mates as postulated by evolutionary psychologists.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is not odd in East Asia. In Japanese undergraduates of both sexes, opposite-sex altruistic behaviours towards family members (rather than towards friends and strangers) were much preferred in LT relationships (Oda et al, 2013). In this study, females have not shown the preferences for altruistic mates as postulated by evolutionary psychologists.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Although a few studies (e.g. Chang et al, 2011;Oda et al, 2013) with Asian participants partly support our findings, the conclusions should be treated with caution.…”
Section: Limitations and Recommendations For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, studies have found that individuals increase their prosocial behaviour in mating scenarios, such as when being observed by potential mates (Bhogal, Galbraith, & Manktelow, 2016b;Farrelly, Lazarus, & Roberts, 2007;Iredale, Vugt, & Dunbar, 2008;Tognetti, Berticat, Raymond, & Faurie, 2012;Tognetti, Dubois, Faurie, & Willinger, 2016) and also when competing with others (Raihani & Smith, 2015;Tognetti et al, 2016). Furthermore, it has also been shown that prosocial individuals are consistently considered more desirable than their non-prosocial counterparts (Barclay, 2010;Farrelly, 2011Farrelly, , 2013Guo, Feng, & Wang, 2015;Moore et al, 2013;Oda, Okuda, Takeda, & Hiraishi, 2014;Oda, Shibata, Kiyonari, Takeda, & Matsumoto-Oda, 2013;Phillips, Barnard, Ferguson, & Reader, 2008). Furthermore, it has also been shown that prosocial individuals are consistently considered more desirable than their non-prosocial counterparts (Barclay, 2010;Farrelly, 2011Farrelly, , 2013Guo, Feng, & Wang, 2015;Moore et al, 2013;Oda, Okuda, Takeda, & Hiraishi, 2014;Oda, Shibata, Kiyonari, Takeda, & Matsumoto-Oda, 2013;Phillips, Barnard, Ferguson, & Reader, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%