2003
DOI: 10.1078/0018-442x-00049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexually dimorphic pelvic morphology in South African whites and blacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, a less subjective argumentation highlights the reliability of the data. 9,10,11,12,13 However, the quantification of the structures used in the metric method is not yet well understood.…”
Section: Declaration Of Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a less subjective argumentation highlights the reliability of the data. 9,10,11,12,13 However, the quantification of the structures used in the metric method is not yet well understood.…”
Section: Declaration Of Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both morphological and metric analyses were employed, and where possible, South African standards were utilised (e.g. Steyn & Işcan, 1999;Asala, 2001;Patriquin et al, 2003). The age distribution for the complete sample was standardised by following the guidelines provided by Falys & Lewis (2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, gender-based differences in pelvic and sacral morphology are well-documented (Tague, 1992;Patriquin, Loth, & Steyn, 2003;Tague, 2005), possibly influencing lumbopelvic sitting postures and related functional tissue adaptations. Other gender-based anthropometric differences could also exist that may influence lumbo-pelvic sitting postures and/or flexibility.…”
Section: Clinical Implications and Further Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%