1999
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SEXUALITY IN THE WORKPLACE: Organizational Control, Sexual Harassment, and the Pursuit of Pleasure

Abstract: Flirting, bantering, and other sexual interactions are commonplace in work organizations. Not all of these interactions constitute harassment or assault; consensual sexual relationships, defined as those reflecting positive and autonomous expressions of workers' sexual desire, are also prevalent in the workplace and are the focus of this paper. We begin by reviewing research on the distinction between sexual harassment and sexual consent. Next we examine popular and business literatures on office romance. Fina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
164
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(8 reference statements)
2
164
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The different "locker room" and "dorm room" cultures of the publishers led to different definitions of sexual harassment. While survey research often assumes that sexual harassment events have a fixed meaning, this study and others (Handy 2006;McCabe and Hardman 2005) demonstrate that interpretations of sexual conduct vary by work context (Williams et al 1999).…”
Section: Sexual Conduct and Sexual Harassment At Workmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The different "locker room" and "dorm room" cultures of the publishers led to different definitions of sexual harassment. While survey research often assumes that sexual harassment events have a fixed meaning, this study and others (Handy 2006;McCabe and Hardman 2005) demonstrate that interpretations of sexual conduct vary by work context (Williams et al 1999).…”
Section: Sexual Conduct and Sexual Harassment At Workmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Sociologists (Dunn 1999;Smith and Morra 1994;Uggen and Blackstone 2004;Seal and Ehrhardt 2003;Emerson, Ferris, and Gardner 1998;Williams, Giuffre, and Dellinger 1999;Armstrong, Gleckman-Krut, and Johnson 2018) Many forms of what comes to be identified as stalking grow out of glitches and discontinuities in two very common and normal relationship processes-coming together and forming new relationships on the one hand, and dissolving and getting out of existing relationships on the other. In this way the processes and experience of being stalked are intricately linked to normal, everyday practices for establishing, advancing, and ending relationships.…”
Section: Clare Forstiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hazy distinction between flirtation and harassment is a broadly recognisable problem, especially for sociological research about sexuality in the workplace (Williams, Patti, and Dellinger 1999). Here, again, context and categorical roles are central to understandings of what is 'appropriate' between co-present interactants, especially considering how structures of power might intervene, and can be differently interpreted (Yelvington, Osella, and Osella 1999).…”
Section: Social Organisation Of Flirting: Civil Inattention and Respementioning
confidence: 99%