APA Handbook of Sexuality and Psychology, Vol. 1: Person-Based Approaches. 2014
DOI: 10.1037/14193-010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexuality in the context of relationships.

Abstract: Research on mate selection criteria, or the traits that people report desiring in a romantic partner, has largely focused on gender differences and suggested that men and women value different criteria in potential mates. Across 37 cultures, when asked to rank the qualities that are desired in a mate, women ranked dependability, stability, education, and intelligence more highly than men for a long-term

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 298 publications
(400 reference statements)
4
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two methodological strengths of this research are the data collection from dyads and the daily event-level collection of data. The dyadic approach is especially important since an overwhelming majority of sexual experiences take place within the context of a partner (Impett, Muise, & Peragine, 2013). The daily event-level collection of data offers more contextual information that previous research examining the constructs of interest have been unable to provide (e.g., Mark, 2012;Mark & Murray, 2012;Willoughby & Vitas, 2012;Willoughby et al, in press).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two methodological strengths of this research are the data collection from dyads and the daily event-level collection of data. The dyadic approach is especially important since an overwhelming majority of sexual experiences take place within the context of a partner (Impett, Muise, & Peragine, 2013). The daily event-level collection of data offers more contextual information that previous research examining the constructs of interest have been unable to provide (e.g., Mark, 2012;Mark & Murray, 2012;Willoughby & Vitas, 2012;Willoughby et al, in press).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although sexual and relationship satisfaction have been connected in numerous cross-sectional studies (see Impett et al, 2014; Sprecher & Cate, 2004), prior research has been inconsistent in demonstrating the direction of that relationship. The two longitudinal studies described here used eight assessments of sexual and marital satisfaction from 207 newlywed couples that spanned the first several years of marriage to demonstrate that the association between sexual and marital satisfaction was bidirectional.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Does satisfying sex make for a happier relationship or does a happy relationship lead to more satisfying sex? Although sexual satisfaction is clearly a strong correlate of relationship satisfaction (for reviews, see Impett, Muise, & Peragine, 2014; Sprecher & Cate, 2004), the exact nature of that association is much less clear. As with any correlation, it is possible that (1) sexual satisfaction predicts subsequent relationship satisfaction, (2) relationship satisfaction predicts subsequent sexual satisfaction, (3) the association is bidirectional, or (4) there is no causal relationship between sexual and relationship satisfaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Romantic relationships provide a context for sexual behavior to occur with the same person in tandem with other interpersonal exchanges (Impett, Muise, & Peragine, 2013). Therefore, the experience of sexual behavior with romantic relationship partners provides a different context for the development of sexual esteem than the same behaviors with non-committed partners (Impett et al, 2013).…”
Section: Sexual Esteem In Romantic Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%