2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12978-019-0791-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexuality and contraceptive knowledge in university students: instrument development and psychometric analysis using item response theory

Abstract: Background As a consequence of biological, psychological and social changes during puberty, youth is a period characterized by impulsiveness and risk-taking. Members of this population often feel invulnerable and have a strong motivation to explore their identity. A good level of knowledge is necessary to allow young people to experience their sexuality in a healthy way, without associated risks. In our environment there is currently no valid Spanish-language tool to measure the level of knowledge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Level of knowledge about Sex&CM: measured through the SexContraKnow-Instrument scale, validated in Spanish and consisting of 15 items with three answer options (True/False, Do not know, No answer). The scale showed a reliability of 0.99 for items and 0.74 for people [ 19 ]. The score range is between 0 and 15, and the level of knowledge is categorized as excellent (≥90%), very good (70–89%), good (55–69%), insufficient (30–54%), and poor (≤29%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Level of knowledge about Sex&CM: measured through the SexContraKnow-Instrument scale, validated in Spanish and consisting of 15 items with three answer options (True/False, Do not know, No answer). The scale showed a reliability of 0.99 for items and 0.74 for people [ 19 ]. The score range is between 0 and 15, and the level of knowledge is categorized as excellent (≥90%), very good (70–89%), good (55–69%), insufficient (30–54%), and poor (≤29%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the present results should be interpreted with the study limitations in mind, viz., the use of an original questionnaire may skew the results as it is possible that the items assessed may not be representative of the real knowledge about contraception; this is a common obstacle in studies regarding contraceptive literacy [ 16 , 17 ]. The study was developed in schools close to the authors’ practice location (two in the Northern region of Portugal and one in the Center) and results may not represent the knowledge and attitudes of adolescents throughout the whole country; however, sexual education programs and family planning appointments are defined by law, so, barring local or regional constraints, all adolescents should have been exposed to similar information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale showed a reliability of 0.99 for the items and 0.74 for the persons; the intraclass correlation coe cient for testretest reliability obtained a value of 0.81. [17] The score range is between 0 and 15, and the level of knowledge is categorized as follows: excellent (≥90% correct), very good (89-70%), good (69-50%), and insu cient (< 50%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%