2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31395-5_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexuality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, rather than being mutually exclusive, religious and non-heterosexual identities seem to interdigitate in more complex and ambiguous ways (171). As argued by Page and Shipley, comparing religion (seen as "oppressive and archaic") on the one end of the spectrum and secularism (seen as "liberating and rational") on the other, may not be as straightforward as it seems (172)even though it appears an attractive option, as there are many shades in the middle. Many LGB individuals manage perfectly well to integrate their sexuality with religious beliefs even when the official stance of their religion-as is generally true for major monotheistic religions-is unwelcoming (171).…”
Section: So -Called 'Conversion Therapies'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, rather than being mutually exclusive, religious and non-heterosexual identities seem to interdigitate in more complex and ambiguous ways (171). As argued by Page and Shipley, comparing religion (seen as "oppressive and archaic") on the one end of the spectrum and secularism (seen as "liberating and rational") on the other, may not be as straightforward as it seems (172)even though it appears an attractive option, as there are many shades in the middle. Many LGB individuals manage perfectly well to integrate their sexuality with religious beliefs even when the official stance of their religion-as is generally true for major monotheistic religions-is unwelcoming (171).…”
Section: So -Called 'Conversion Therapies'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars, such as Yip (2010, 667), have begun to question this approach and ask, “Why is religion so pervasively perceived—by many religious believers and non-believers alike—as intrinsically sexnegative, or at least sex-restricting and constraining?” In answering this challenge, an emerging group of researchers have begun to critique this tendency to treat “religion” as inherently oppositional to “sexuality” (Avishai 2012; Avishai and Burke 2016; Burke 2016; Fuist 2017; Moon 2004; Page and Shipley 2016; Wilcox 2006; Yip 2010). This body of work ranges in their criticisms from reminders that neither institution is monolithic (Ellingson 2002; Fuist 2017; Page and Shipley 2016) to showcasing how official mandates do not fully capture individuals’ religious lives (Avishai 2012; Burke 2014; Fuist 2017). A consistent thread within these studies has been an attempt to offer a more nuanced understanding of the myriad ways that religious culture shapes how people feel about sex and sexuality in their lives (as well as within public discourses).…”
Section: Emotionalism Of Religious Sexualitymentioning
confidence: 99%