2014
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual size dimorphism is not associated with the evolution of parental care in frogs

Abstract: Sex differences in parental care are thought to arise from differential selection on the sexes. Sexual dimorphism, including sexual size dimorphism (SSD), is often used as a proxy for sexual selection on males. Some studies have found an association between male-biased SSD (i.e., males larger than females) and the loss of paternal care. While the relationship between sexual selection on males and parental care evolution has been studied extensively, the relationship between female-biased SSD (i.e., females lar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(95 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, trophic egg feeding is also associated with reduced egg size (electronic supplementary material, table S6), implying that mothers may reduce the cost of egg production using this type of nourishment. Finally, the evolutionary relationship between male care and size dimorphism has been debated [32][33][34], and our results using fine-scaled care variables, multi-predictor models and more extensive taxonomic coverage than previous studies, confirm that male care is associated with SSD [44]. We suggest two mutually non-exclusive explanations for the increased male size (relative to female size) with the extent of male care.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Moreover, trophic egg feeding is also associated with reduced egg size (electronic supplementary material, table S6), implying that mothers may reduce the cost of egg production using this type of nourishment. Finally, the evolutionary relationship between male care and size dimorphism has been debated [32][33][34], and our results using fine-scaled care variables, multi-predictor models and more extensive taxonomic coverage than previous studies, confirm that male care is associated with SSD [44]. We suggest two mutually non-exclusive explanations for the increased male size (relative to female size) with the extent of male care.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Differences between the sexes may arise as a result of sexual selection (Hedrick and Temeles, 1989) and result in differences in body size (Woolbright, 1983) and other morphological traits (Desjardins and Fernald, 2009). As the energetic cost of gamete production strongly differs between the sexes, this often results in differences in body size and life-history traits (Monroe and Alonzo, 2014). Moreover, exploration behavior may also be different in males and females because of the association between male exploration and territorial aggressiveness, as has been shown in birds and fish (Carere et al, 2005;Brown et al, 2007;Dzieweczynski and Crovo, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences between sexes may arise as a result of sexual selection (Hedrick & Temeles, 1989) and result in differences in body size (Woolbright, 1983) and other morphological traits (Desjardins & Fernald, 2009). As the energetic cost of gamete production differs between the sexes, this often results in differences in body size and life-history traits (Monroe & Alonzo, 2014). Changes in exploratory trait values and aggressiveness have been shown to occur in the male sex in birds and fish, as well as in male (and less often female) fruit flies (Chen, Lee, Bowens, Huber, & Kravitz, 2002;Sturtevant, 1915).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%