JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org..
University of California Press and AmericanOrnithologists' Union are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Auk.ABSTRACT.-Skuas and jaegers (Stercorariinae), like other birds with a raptorial lifestyle, display reversed sexual dimorphism in size (RSD) in which females are larger than males. This condition is commonly believed to be associated with the morphology or behavioral ecology of avian predators, and numerous theoretical explanations have been presented to account for its evolution. Most tests of these ideas have been theoretical or based on comparative analyses. We present tests of specific hypotheses of RSD based on field studies of Great Skuas (Catharacta skua) and Parasitic Jaegers (Stercorarius parasiticus) breeding in Shetland. We also present a comparative analysis of foraging behavior and degree of RSD within the Stercorariinae. We found no support for the popular theories that claim that RSD evolved as a result of specialized roles during breeding. Large females were not more fecund, nor were they the main defenders of the nest. Male body size was not correlated with any breeding parameter. In addition, interspecific comparisons did not support the idea that the degree of RSD is related to foraging behavior during the breeding season (as opposed to morphology). Female dominance within pairs did not affect any breeding parameters. Support was found for theories that RSD is linked to sexual selection. Large females had an advantage when pairing with older males, which could be a result of intrasexual competition for mates. There was assortative mating for size, indicating that small males could also have an advantage in pairing, because large males seem to be rejected by small females. Given the disparate results of several previous studies, we conclude that a large body of empirical evidence will be needed before we can draw firm conclusions about the main selective factors that act to maintain current levels of RSD in natural populations of raptorial birds. THE MECHANISMS behind the origin and maintenance of sexual size dimorphism in animals are poorly known (Hedrick and Temeles 1989). Several unrelated groups of birds display reversed sexual dimorphism in size (RSD; females larger than males), suggesting that this condition evolved independently on a number of occasions (Jehl and Murray 1986, Paton et al. 1994). Reversed size dimorphism is a common feature of some avian groups with a raptorial lifestyle, principally the diurnal and nocturnal birds of prey, skuas and jaegers, and frigatebirds. This has led to the belief that the evolution of reversed size dimorphism is linked to the morphology or behavioral ecology of avian predato...