2008
DOI: 10.1665/1082-6467-17.2.189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual size dimorphism in Orthoptera (sens. str.) — a review

Abstract: BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
48
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
10
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a proximate cause for SSD in millipedes the evidence corroborated the sexual bimaturism hypothesis [11] . As an ultimate cause for SSD this together with ecological evidence corroborated the intersexual competition hypothesis [14][15][16] . The small-male mating advantage may apply [17] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a proximate cause for SSD in millipedes the evidence corroborated the sexual bimaturism hypothesis [11] . As an ultimate cause for SSD this together with ecological evidence corroborated the intersexual competition hypothesis [14][15][16] . The small-male mating advantage may apply [17] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Sexual size dimorphism is prevalent in arthropods and females are usually larger than males e. g. beetles [1] ; sea spiders [2] ; orthopterans [15] . Behavioural patterns such as provisioning versus non-provisioning relate to SSD [3] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a sexual size dimorphism (SSD) has been linked to diff erences in the number of instars between the sexes -with larger females usually having one more instar than males (Hochkirch & Gröning 2008) or facultatively inserting an additional development stage to increase body size (Esperk et al 2007). Diff erences in development time have been found to cause SSD in other arthropods (Wiklund & Forsberg 1991;Wedell 1992;Maklakov et al 2004;Berner & Blanckenhorn 2006) but we did not fi nd any signifi cant variations in development time between male and female A. b. vicheti.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…This is most relevant because in a vast majority of insects and particularly in grasshoppers females are usually larger than males. In grasshoppers, there are many cases of extreme female-biased SSD in families such as Proscopiidae, Ommexechidae, and Romaleidae but information regarding Rensch's rule is extremely scarce [56]. Furthermore, since patterns of SSD are probably heavily influenced by Bergmannian or converse-Bergmannian body size patterns, which in turn depend on clinal variation of abiotic factors [57], a clarification of Rensch's rule in grasshoppers is needed.…”
Section: Rensch's Rule Is Affected By Bergmann's Rule or Itsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to male-male competition for access to females, SSD could favor an increase in male body size. On the other hand, larger size in females could be favored by natural selection since fecundity is directly correlated with body size [56,58].…”
Section: Rensch's Rule Is Affected By Bergmann's Rule or Itsmentioning
confidence: 99%