2014
DOI: 10.22271/j.ento.2014.v2.i6e.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual size dimorphism and corroboration of Rensch’s rule in Chersastus millipedes (Diplopoda: Pachybolidae)

Abstract: Sexual Size Dimorphism (SSD) was investigated in the millipede genus Chersastus. Mass, length and width were used to compare intraspecific variation in four species. Interspecific variation in volume was calculated in 18 species and an allometric coefficient of 0.85 found, which corroborates Rensch's rule in this genus.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Copulation may be female mediated in C. inscriptus. The explanation for the reduced copulation duration in the hetero-specific crosses cannot be based on species sexual size preference [18] , sex ratio [17] or sperm load [25] as these factors were controlled in the cross mating experiment. It is possible that variation in genital morphologies and loss of genital contact are responsible for the reduced copulation durations [26] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Copulation may be female mediated in C. inscriptus. The explanation for the reduced copulation duration in the hetero-specific crosses cannot be based on species sexual size preference [18] , sex ratio [17] or sperm load [25] as these factors were controlled in the cross mating experiment. It is possible that variation in genital morphologies and loss of genital contact are responsible for the reduced copulation durations [26] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inscribed red millipede Centrobolus inscriptus and the red ringed millipede C. annulatus exemplify this sympatry [17] . They have equal sexual size dimorphism [18] , but differ in copulation duration [19] and genital structure [20] . A one-way cross experiment between C. inscriptus and C. annulatus was performed to find changes in mediation of copulation duration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arcsine of length: width ratios places the sexes as equally apart as was the distribution for width (Figure 1d). The combination of these two parameters may be perceived as sexual size dimorphism as represented by the distribution of body volumes (Cooper, In Press) [2] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Centrobolus millipedes obey Rensch's Rule as females are larger and there is a steady rise in sexual size dimorphism with overall body size with the allometric coefficient of 0.85 [2] . This allometric finding was also made by earlier myriapodologists [3] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The active release of ejaculate post-insemination and copulation duration was studied in Centrobolus inscriptus where sperm or ejaculate precedence correlates with prolonged second copulation duration and re-analysis of sperm volumes from single and double mating experiments with 24 hour (h) delays post-mating [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] . In order to provide supporting evidence for female control of ejaculate and sperm dumping after mating, ejaculate volumes released from females 24h after mating was studied and compared alongside double matings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%