1999
DOI: 10.1093/aesa/92.4.571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Selection on Male Morphology Independent of Male-Male Competition in the Mediterranean Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results about HW are unclear but this trait might be female strain-dependent. Norry et al (1999), working under laboratory conditions with the same wild population (Alto Valle, Patagonia) and removing experimentally the presence of male-male competition (allowing only intersexual selection to occur) inferred that head morphology was a good predictor of mating success, while body size (TL) had no apparent effect. Rodriguero et al (2002) suggested that the advantage of larger males in field cage experiments where male-male interactions can take place could be explained by the occurrence of intrasexual selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results about HW are unclear but this trait might be female strain-dependent. Norry et al (1999), working under laboratory conditions with the same wild population (Alto Valle, Patagonia) and removing experimentally the presence of male-male competition (allowing only intersexual selection to occur) inferred that head morphology was a good predictor of mating success, while body size (TL) had no apparent effect. Rodriguero et al (2002) suggested that the advantage of larger males in field cage experiments where male-male interactions can take place could be explained by the occurrence of intrasexual selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mating success in C. capitata is determined by factors such as morphology (Churchill Stanland et al, 1986;Hunt et al, 1998;Norry et al, 1999;Orozco and Ló pez, 1993;Rodriguero et al, 2002), nutritional level (Blay and Yuval, 1997), and behaviour (Calcagno, , 2002. To date, there is very little information, if any, about the occurrence of assortative mating based on morphology, even though there is evidence of departures from random mating respect to strain (eg, Zapien et al, 1983;McInnis et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each wing was then photographed using a Firewire digital camera (3 megapixels; Jenoptik ProgRes C10, Germany) through the phototube of a stereomicroscope (SZX12, Olympus) at × 20 magnification. As a size-related trait ( Norry et al , 1999 ), wing length was measured (in mm) from the intersection of the anal and median band to the margin of the costal band and the R 4 + 5 vein ( Perez-Staples et al , 2007a ) using Image Tools software, version 2.25 (University of Texas, San Antonio, Texas).…”
Section: Mating Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of mating behavior in C. capitata have shown that various parameters determine male mating success, including body size, body symmetry, protein intake and courtship activity (Blay & Yuval 1997, Orozco & Lopez 1993, Norry et al 1999, Rodriguero et al 2002. Considering the good performance of Hybrid-Pop flies during their immature phase, and the large size of emerging adults, it makes sense that Hybrid-Pop males could successfully compete with Lab-Pop males for laboratory-reared females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%