1996
DOI: 10.1007/s002650050212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual selection, male morphology, and the efficacy of courtship signalling in two wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
142
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
142
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is apparently the combination of tufts and foreleg tapping that attracts predator attention. This supports earlier hypotheses that decorative tufts on the forelegs of S. ocreata function as amplifiers or attention signals (Hasson, 1991(Hasson, , 1997 increasing the efficacy of the leg-tapping display (McClintock and Uetz, 1996;Scheffer et al, 1996;Hebets and Uetz, 2000). Hebets and Uetz (2000) found a correlation between the presence of decorations and pigmentation on the forelegs of Schizocosa species males and the level of visual display they exhibited.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is apparently the combination of tufts and foreleg tapping that attracts predator attention. This supports earlier hypotheses that decorative tufts on the forelegs of S. ocreata function as amplifiers or attention signals (Hasson, 1991(Hasson, , 1997 increasing the efficacy of the leg-tapping display (McClintock and Uetz, 1996;Scheffer et al, 1996;Hebets and Uetz, 2000). Hebets and Uetz (2000) found a correlation between the presence of decorations and pigmentation on the forelegs of Schizocosa species males and the level of visual display they exhibited.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Scheffer et al (1996) found that in the absence of vibratory cues in courtship, the presence of tufts on courting male S. ocreata significantly increased female receptivity. The size of male tufts, in both live males (McClintock and Uetz, 1996) and video playback experiments (Uetz, 2000), may also influence female receptivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus, females change their mating decision in relation to the environmental conditions: in clear water, they rely more on visual than olfactory cues, but the pattern is reversed in turbid water (Heuschele et al, 2009). Similar patterns of flexible preferences for multi-component signals were also observed by Calkins and Burley (2003) in the Californian Quail, Callipepla californica, and in the wolf spider Schizocosa ocreata (Scheffer et al, 1996).…”
Section: Multiple Cues Multi-dimension Preference Functions and Mulsupporting
confidence: 63%