2010
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arq016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual selection in honey bees: colony variation and the importance of size in male mating success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
42
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
42
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Among drones, limited access to pollen reduces their reproductive quality (Czekońska et al 2015) and mating success (Couvillon et al 2010). Pollen limitation can also affect bees' susceptibility to Nosema spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among drones, limited access to pollen reduces their reproductive quality (Czekońska et al 2015) and mating success (Couvillon et al 2010). Pollen limitation can also affect bees' susceptibility to Nosema spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, eusocial hymenoptera colonies generally produce a skewed number of individuals of one sex over the other (Boomsma & Grafen ), which should therefore generate intense competition among individuals of the more numerous sex (Emlen & Oring ), and there is evidence that sexual selection effectively operates through male scramble competition (Hölldobler ; Couvillon et al. ), sperm competition in polyandrous species (Baer & Boomsma ; Jaffé et al. ) and even mate choice in wasps (de Souza et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the challenge of tracking and measuring behaviours during nuptial flights, when males and females mate on the wing within a large swarm of other sexual individuals, may have led to underestimating the importance of male competition in these species. Indeed, eusocial hymenoptera colonies generally produce a skewed number of individuals of one sex over the other (Boomsma & Grafen 1991), which should therefore generate intense competition among individuals of the more numerous sex (Emlen & Oring 1977), and there is evidence that sexual selection effectively operates through male scramble competition (H€ olldobler 1976;Couvillon et al 2010), sperm competition in polyandrous species (Baer & Boomsma 2004;Jaff e et al 2012) and even mate choice in wasps (de Souza et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the characteristics of their morphology and sexual functioning have been shaped primarily by sexual selection, rather than natural or kin selection (Baer, 2010), but explicit studies of the possible trade-offs involved in maximizing ant male reproductive success have been scant (Boomsma et al, 2005). Exceptions are a recent study on honeybees showing male size to be an important predictor of reproductive success (Couvillon et al, 2010), as well as studies on Cardiocondyla male ants, which are peculiar because they are long-lived and spermatogenesis continues throughout adult life (Heinze and Hölldobler, 1993;Heinze and Schrempf, 2008) in contrast to all other known ants where sperm production ceases during the pupal stage (Hölldobler and Bartz, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%