1976
DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(76)90006-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual selection for a handicap: A critical analysis of Zahavi's model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has generally been claimed that good genes models of sexual selection could not work. First, because of a presumed lack of additive genetic variance in fitness (Fisher, 1930;Gustafsson, 1986); and second, because models based on good genes arguments have failed to show any significant effects on the evolution of male ornaments other than those already predicted by Fisher's process (Maynard Smith, 1976;Davis and O'Donald, 1976;Kirkpatrick, 1986a). Recent modeling, based on the assumption that additive genetic variation is being maintained by host-parasite cycles or by mutation, has confirmed that sexual ornaments may become exaggerated because of female choice of superior genotypes (Kirkpatrick, 1986b;Pomiankowski, 1987Pomiankowski, , 1988.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has generally been claimed that good genes models of sexual selection could not work. First, because of a presumed lack of additive genetic variance in fitness (Fisher, 1930;Gustafsson, 1986); and second, because models based on good genes arguments have failed to show any significant effects on the evolution of male ornaments other than those already predicted by Fisher's process (Maynard Smith, 1976;Davis and O'Donald, 1976;Kirkpatrick, 1986a). Recent modeling, based on the assumption that additive genetic variation is being maintained by host-parasite cycles or by mutation, has confirmed that sexual ornaments may become exaggerated because of female choice of superior genotypes (Kirkpatrick, 1986b;Pomiankowski, 1987Pomiankowski, , 1988.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A longer passage in the opening paragraph of this letter discloses some of his discomfort with a formal style of theorizing: ''The model of the handicap principle has been disputed by Maynard Smith (1976) and Davis and O'Donald (1976). They claimed on the basis of mathematical models that the handicap principle cannot operate under normal conditions.…”
Section: The Handicap Principlementioning
confidence: 87%
“…Early critics of the handicap principle were Maynard Smith (1976) and Davis and O'Donald (1976). Maynard Smith argued that for such a principle to work, it was a necessary condition that the inheritance of the handicap was limited to the sex displaying the handicap, in order to avoid that this fitness cost would be given to offspring of the mate choosing sex.…”
Section: The Handicap Principlementioning
confidence: 98%
“…While these mathematical developments have demonstrated that the principle is not inconsistent with biological theory (contrary to early analyses, see Davis and O'donald 1976;Smith 1976;Kirkpatrick 1986), they do not eliminate the possibility that other mechanisms may be at work. This paper provides an overview of the alternative theories available to explain the presence of signaling, especially when the interests of the communicating parties conflict.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%