1998
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual selection as a side-effect of sexual conflict in the seaweed fly,Coelopa ursina(Diptera: Coelopidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
45
1
6

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
45
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it is quite possible that SAC played a role at early stages in the evolution of the clamping structures of male sepsids. Energetic female shaking behavior that could dislodge males is widespread in sepsids (Eberhard 2005;Ingram et al 2008;Parker 1972;Ward 1983), and also in other related flies in which the male's front legs are not modified (Crean and Gilburn 1998;Eberhard 2000). Shaking may have originally evolved in sepsids due to male-inflicted losses to females when males began to ride them for long periods at oviposition sites; a female with a riding male is probably less able to avoid predators.…”
Section: Conclusion Regarding Cfc and Sacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is quite possible that SAC played a role at early stages in the evolution of the clamping structures of male sepsids. Energetic female shaking behavior that could dislodge males is widespread in sepsids (Eberhard 2005;Ingram et al 2008;Parker 1972;Ward 1983), and also in other related flies in which the male's front legs are not modified (Crean and Gilburn 1998;Eberhard 2000). Shaking may have originally evolved in sepsids due to male-inflicted losses to females when males began to ride them for long periods at oviposition sites; a female with a riding male is probably less able to avoid predators.…”
Section: Conclusion Regarding Cfc and Sacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation in the ability of females to reject males of different sizes results in sexual selection for large male size (Crean and Gilburn, 1998;Crean et al, 2000). Male mate choice also operates on the basis of female fecundity (Pitafi et al, 1990) and longevity (Dunn et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have failed to find evidence of precopulatory female mate choice in order to increase production of heterokaryotypic offspring (Gilburn et al, 1992;Crean and Gilburn, 1998;Crean et al, 2000). Furthermore, the karyotype of a female does not influence whether or not a male will attempt to mate with her (Gilburn, unpublished data), thus disassortative mating also does not occur via male mate choice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Large 61 male coelopids gain a mating advantage in all coelopids so far studied 62 (Crean et al, 2000) and this appears to occur as a result of their superior 63 ability to withstand female rejection for longer (Crean and Gilburn, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%