2007
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual selection and the evolution of obligatory sex

Abstract: Background: Among the long-standing conundrums of evolutionary theory, obligatory sex is one of the hardest. Current theory suggests multiple factors that might explain the benefits of sex when compared with complete asexuality, but no satisfactory explanation for the prevalence of obligatory sex in the face of facultative sexual reproduction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sexual selection makes sexual reproduction more advantageous specifically for individuals in good condition and can lead to obligatory sex [72,73]. A model considering both environmental changes and sexual selection can further extend the parameter range allowing the evolution of obligate sex [72,73]. When poor condition is induced by pathogens, sexual selection also applies: sexual selection can increase the mating success of hosts that are less infected [74], due to preference for either resistance genes or pathogen avoidance [75].…”
Section: Why Is Condition-dependent Sex Not More Common?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sexual selection makes sexual reproduction more advantageous specifically for individuals in good condition and can lead to obligatory sex [72,73]. A model considering both environmental changes and sexual selection can further extend the parameter range allowing the evolution of obligate sex [72,73]. When poor condition is induced by pathogens, sexual selection also applies: sexual selection can increase the mating success of hosts that are less infected [74], due to preference for either resistance genes or pathogen avoidance [75].…”
Section: Why Is Condition-dependent Sex Not More Common?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sexual selection makes sexual reproduction more advantageous specifically for individuals in good condition and can lead to obligatory sex [72,73]. A model considering both environmental changes and sexual selection can further extend the parameter range allowing the evolution of obligate sex [72,73].…”
Section: Why Is Condition-dependent Sex Not More Common?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our simulation results for U ¼ 1 and c ¼ 2 indicate that a low rate of sex can be maintained when deleterious alleles are additive, while sex is not maintained when deleterious alleles are partially recessive (Figure 7, Appendix SD). Note, however, that deleterious mutations may select for higher rates of sex when they also affect the mating success of males, in species in which sexual selection is sufficiently strong (Hadany and Beker 2007). Furthermore, deleterious mutations can act in combination with other factors such as hostparasite interactions (Peters and Lively 1999;Otto and Nuismer 2004;Gandon and Otto 2007;Salathé et al 2008), local adaptation (Pylkov et al 1998;Lenormand and Otto 2000;Agrawal 2009), or adaptive evolution (Otto and Barton 2001).…”
Section: à4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, partially asexual organisms should have N e and neutral genetic diversity similar to that of obligately sexual organisms of similar body size, abundance, and geographic range. The predominance of obligate sexual life cycles is thus surprising and remains unexplained (Hadany and Beker 2007). Partially asexual life cycles, with only occasional rounds of sexual reproduction, occur in many invertebrates and fungi and may provide insights into the fitness and genomic consequences of occasional sex (Bell 1982).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%