1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb02232.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Selection and Survival in North American Waterfowl

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(25 reference statements)
4
37
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In agamid lizards, only dichromatism of body regions 'exposed' to visual predators showed an association with habitat openness, suggesting that natural selection acts primarily via the mechanism of differential predation pressure. Substantial comparative and empirical evidence already exists for a predation cost associated with conspicuous coloration (Endler 1983;Promislow et al 1992Promislow et al , 1994Huhta et al 2003;. This study provides broad comparative support for the view that the evolution of sexual traits results from a trade-off between sexual selection for conspicuous coloration and natural selection via differential predation pressure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In agamid lizards, only dichromatism of body regions 'exposed' to visual predators showed an association with habitat openness, suggesting that natural selection acts primarily via the mechanism of differential predation pressure. Substantial comparative and empirical evidence already exists for a predation cost associated with conspicuous coloration (Endler 1983;Promislow et al 1992Promislow et al , 1994Huhta et al 2003;. This study provides broad comparative support for the view that the evolution of sexual traits results from a trade-off between sexual selection for conspicuous coloration and natural selection via differential predation pressure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…It is now both theoretically and empirically well established that the evolutionary interaction or trade-off between sexual selection and natural selection can generate phenotypic variation (Andersson 1982;Endler 1983Endler , 2000Lande & Kirkpatrick 1988;Price 1998). However, the extent to which such trade-offs generate predictable patterns in the form of sexual dimorphism in secondary sexual traits remains largely unexplored (but see Promislow et al 1992Promislow et al , 1994Cuervo & Møller 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative evidence for survival costs of sexual advertisement comes from studies on birds. Using a phylogenetic framework, Promislow and coworkers (5,6) have shown that sexual dichromatism was associated with higher mortality rate within passerines and waterfowl.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sexual dichromatism in birds is generally thought to arise from sexual selection favoring conspicuous coloration in males, although natural selection (e.g., predation) is thought to ultimately limit conspicuousness (Darwin 1871;Fisher 1930;Hingston 1933;Kodric-Brown and Brown 1984;Kirkpatrick et al 1990;Promislow et al 1992Promislow et al , 1994Andersson 1994). Alternatively, bright coloration may be favored by predation because it advertises that a prey is unprofitable (Cott 1947;Baker and Parker 1979;Gotmark 1992Gotmark , 1993Gotmark , 1995; but see Slagsvold et al 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%