2014
DOI: 10.2174/1570162x12666140129105726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Risk Reduction Interventions for HIV Prevention among South AfricanYouth: A Meta-Analytic Review

Abstract: Objectives To examine the efficacy of sexual risk reduction interventions among South African youth. Methods Electronic databases were searched to identify studies published between 2007 and early 2013. Studies were eligible if they (1) targeted youth age 9–26, (2) evaluated sexual risk reduction interventions and (3) reported at least one behavioral outcome. Independent raters coded study characteristics, and intervention content. Weighted mean effect sizes were calculated; positive effect sizes indicated l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
53
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(63 reference statements)
2
53
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they are not consistent with the findings of a meta-analysis of South African sexual risk reduction interventions among adolescents and youth, which found the interventions delayed sexual intercourse, increased condom use and reduced the number of sex partners [19]. The meta analysis suggested that features of interventions successful at delaying sexual intercourse and increasing condom use relative to the control condition were a focus on social norms, condom skills, gender inequalities and alcohol [19]. (All these factors were addressed in PREPARE).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, they are not consistent with the findings of a meta-analysis of South African sexual risk reduction interventions among adolescents and youth, which found the interventions delayed sexual intercourse, increased condom use and reduced the number of sex partners [19]. The meta analysis suggested that features of interventions successful at delaying sexual intercourse and increasing condom use relative to the control condition were a focus on social norms, condom skills, gender inequalities and alcohol [19]. (All these factors were addressed in PREPARE).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…For example, the PREPARE programme did not include interventions to ensure adolescents had safe, supportive homes, secure livelihoods, and social protection, factors important for adolescent sexual and reproductive health [1, 20]. However, these structural barriers to safe sexual behaviours apply to the other South African settings in which effective sexual risk reduction interventions have been demonstrated [19]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intervention programs with a focus on delaying sexual debut among adolescents, which have targeted both girls and boys, have had mixed findings in their effectiveness (Mathews et al, 2012; O’Leary et al, 2012; Tibbits, Smith, Caldwell, & Flisher, 2011). However, studies examining sex differences in delayed sexual debut after interventions found no statistically significant differences for men and women (O’Leary et al, 2012; Scott-Sheldon, Walstrom, Harrison, Kalichman, & Carey, 2013). The findings from the current study suggest that sexual health education programs geared toward delaying sexual debut among children and adolescents should consider addressing ACEs such as neglect, physical/psychological abuse, sexual abuse, witnessing parental violence and incarceration and/or mental illness of parents/guardians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a meta-analysis by Sheeran et al [23] of 121 condom use studies, knowledge and risk perception have only small correlations with condom use (weighted r < 0.10). More recent studies in sub-Saharan Africa corroborate this and were unable to find strong associations between risk perception and behaviour or intentions [21, 2426]. These findings are unexpected, since theories such as the Health Belief Model and Protection-Motivation theory, assume that risk perception is directly associated with intentions or behaviour [9, 27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%