1980
DOI: 10.2307/1122289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…141 Worse yet, a court may use this asymmetrical standard to uphold invidious protectionist discrimination against women "which, in practical effect, puts women, not on a pedestal, but in a cage." 142 A critic of MacKinnon has argued that the subordination approach makes a return to such an era of invidious protectionist discrimination "all too likely," 143 noting that Muller v. Oregon, 144 a protectionist Lochner 145 era case restricting women's working hours on the rationale that women's primary function was to bear children, was cited approvingly by a 1974 Supreme Court case upholding remedial legislation on behalf of women. 146 Thus, the dangers inherent in applying a double standard to gender-discriminatory laws militate against MacKinnon's subordination approach to gender equality.…”
Section: Lessons From States' Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…141 Worse yet, a court may use this asymmetrical standard to uphold invidious protectionist discrimination against women "which, in practical effect, puts women, not on a pedestal, but in a cage." 142 A critic of MacKinnon has argued that the subordination approach makes a return to such an era of invidious protectionist discrimination "all too likely," 143 noting that Muller v. Oregon, 144 a protectionist Lochner 145 era case restricting women's working hours on the rationale that women's primary function was to bear children, was cited approvingly by a 1974 Supreme Court case upholding remedial legislation on behalf of women. 146 Thus, the dangers inherent in applying a double standard to gender-discriminatory laws militate against MacKinnon's subordination approach to gender equality.…”
Section: Lessons From States' Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%