2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0277-5395(03)00106-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual harassment in the workplace: a feminist analysis of recent developments in the UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, even when various control variables were taken into account, respondents' sexist views of women proved among the most influential variable on perceptions of SH (Table 2), but not when all the offenses were taken into account (Table 3). These findings support the inclusion of SH as an example of male-against-female offenses (see Samuels 2003Samuels , 2004.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, even when various control variables were taken into account, respondents' sexist views of women proved among the most influential variable on perceptions of SH (Table 2), but not when all the offenses were taken into account (Table 3). These findings support the inclusion of SH as an example of male-against-female offenses (see Samuels 2003Samuels , 2004.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…But it has also been also argued that feminist advocates must still continue the struggle, and challenge the sexual nature of law and policies; widen the definition of SH in them to other non-sexual, but harassing behaviors; persuade the courts and organizations to adopt their analysis of the law on SH; establish women's perspectives as the formal basis for judgments of the occurrence of SH; and ensure that women's voices are heard in trials and complaints procedures (Samuels 2003). In sum, feminists have to convince policymakers and organizational authorities that in most instances SH is not about individualized bad behavior, but is constituted within broader cultural values and power relationships, especially those operating around gender and sexuality (Rimalt 2005;Samuels 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In attempting to reconcile the power model of SH with studies suggesting that co-workers are commonly identified as harassers (e.g. AHRC, 2012), Samuels (2003) has argued that a feminist perspective views power not as an unmediated force but as an amalgam of ideological influences both within and outside the workplace, rendering women, even if in more senior positions, more vulnerable (see also Wajcman, 1998).…”
Section: Workplace Sexual Harassment: Explanatory Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%