1987
DOI: 10.1093/mollus/53.1.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Dimorphism of Shell Shape and Growth of Villosa Villosa (Wright) and Elliptio Icterina (Conrad) (Bivalvia: Unionidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data analysis uses the principles and methods developed by Mosimann (1970Mosimann ( , 1975a, Mosimann and James (1979), and Darroch and Mosimann (1985). For other applications of these methods to problems of allometry in marine invertebrates, see Kotrla and James (1987) and Spivey (1988). Size and shape variables are defined a priori, and the models use the assumption of lognormally distributed variables (Rohlf 1990).…”
Section: Analysis Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data analysis uses the principles and methods developed by Mosimann (1970Mosimann ( , 1975a, Mosimann and James (1979), and Darroch and Mosimann (1985). For other applications of these methods to problems of allometry in marine invertebrates, see Kotrla and James (1987) and Spivey (1988). Size and shape variables are defined a priori, and the models use the assumption of lognormally distributed variables (Rohlf 1990).…”
Section: Analysis Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Median values of lifespan and K for all these groups range from 25 to 50 and 0.10 to 0.17, respectively (Haag and Rypel 2011). Westralunio carteri is similar to these groups in having no sexual dimorphism and little difference in growth between sexes, although the small sex-specific differences in growth seen in the Brunswick River could indicate the presence of subtle, quantitative differences in growth trajectories between males and females (e.g., Kotrla and James 1987). Another important similarity to these long-lived groups is the prob- Table 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…That said, in our proposed schema identification of sex using shell morphology is the easiest method for assigning sex, in terms of effort, and is non-lethal, but is also inaccurate as we have shown with this study ( Fig 3a ). This approach is frequently used [ 18 , 19 , 53 – 55 ] but should be abandoned until it can be demonstrated that error rates are less than what was shown in this study or if it is used only to provide preliminary estimates of sex that are then surveyed using more robust methods. Shell analysis with the aid of morphometric and shape recognition approaches could provide more reliable estimates of sex based on external morphology and has been used with other aquatic taxa [ 56 – 58 ] ( Fig 3b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%