“…Although the sternum finds its suitable place in these studies, the clavicle has remained underrepresented in this endeavour. Either gross bone specimens (clavicle and sternum) collected from autopsied cadavers and some prominent historical bone collections [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][25][26][27][28]31,32,34,37,38 or their radiographs (in the form of X-rays, CT/MRI scans) from living subjects or of skeletonised remains 8,29,33,35,36,39 have been studied for sex estimations in forensic anthropology. The majority of such studies have reported that osteometric features of these two bones are highly sexually dimorphic and population specific, and show secular variations in their shape and size over a period of time.…”