2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2007.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual dimorphism of acetabulum–pubis index in South-Indian population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, especially the ischium length dimension (ischium length b) is good to elucidate sexual dimorphism, as it also includes the full width of the acetabulum and can thus be expected to be much larger in males. On the downside, the inclusion of part of the (larger) acetabulum in males in the pubis length measurement somewhat obscures the dimorphism, as it masks the longer pubis length expected in females [7,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, especially the ischium length dimension (ischium length b) is good to elucidate sexual dimorphism, as it also includes the full width of the acetabulum and can thus be expected to be much larger in males. On the downside, the inclusion of part of the (larger) acetabulum in males in the pubis length measurement somewhat obscures the dimorphism, as it masks the longer pubis length expected in females [7,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex determination based on osteologic and radiologic examination from hand and foot bones (18–28) and a few studies on determination of sex from morphometric analysis of hand and foot dimensions have been conducted in the past (29–38). The need for population‐specific data for methods based on anthropometric measurements has been emphasized time and again as there are vast differences in body size in various populations (39). The principal aim of the present study is to determine sex from dimensions of hands and feet in an endogamous North Indian population using statistical considerations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we searched the literature we found that long bones, skulls, and hip bones are often utilized for this purpose (Ferembach et al, 1980). It is known that not only sex affects the existence of morphological differences on bones, but also race, geographical location, age, and the bulk of muscles that hold the bones (Albanese, 2003;Coleman, 1969;Listi & Bassett, 2006;Nagesh et al, 2007;Patriquin et al, 2002;Patriquin et al, 2005;Schulter-Ellis & Hayek, 1988;Tague, 1989). For example; Schulter-Ellis and Hayek state in their studies that the acetabulum-pubis index among the…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%