2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00004.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Dimorphism in the Quantitative-Genetic Architecture of Floral, Leaf, and Allocation Traits in Silene Latifolia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
112
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
7
112
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, males with larger floral displays receive more pollinator visits [40]. The fitness increase associated with the higher production of flowers in males has important implications for the evolution of sexual dimorphism [41,65,66], which is thought to be driven by selection for increased flower number in males [41,42], the most extremely dimorphic trait [67]. For selection to occur, genetic variation should translate into differences in fitness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, males with larger floral displays receive more pollinator visits [40]. The fitness increase associated with the higher production of flowers in males has important implications for the evolution of sexual dimorphism [41,65,66], which is thought to be driven by selection for increased flower number in males [41,42], the most extremely dimorphic trait [67]. For selection to occur, genetic variation should translate into differences in fitness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Males are likely to produce many flowers as a result of sexual selection to attract more pollinators [40], whereas fecundity selection may favour females with larger and hence fewer flowers because of a negative genetic correlation between flower size and number, and a positive genetic correlation between flower size and ovule number [39,41,42]. Positive selection on the number of flowers in males has been suggested, but never, to our knowledge, tested with direct methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such experiments have shown remarkable sexual dimorphism and genetic correlations between the sexes for multiple fitness-related traits in S. latifolia (Meagher, 1999;Delph, 2007). Flower size, flower number and leaf traits have been extensively studied; these traits vary in their means and degree of sexual dimorphism among populations, and genetic correlations within and between the sexes are high (Steven et al, 2007). Sex-specific quantitative trait loci have been found for these traits, especially in males; the finding that the major ones are on the sex chromosomes (Scotti and Delph, 2006) suggests that the studies on the evolution of sexual dimorphism in this species may uncover examples of sexual antagonism.…”
Section: Sexual Dimorphism and Sexual Antagonismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An explanation for this may be the existence of sexually antagonistic selection pressures on flower numbers in this species. Male S. latifolia plants are probably under sexual selection for high flower numbers, whereas fecundity selection in females favours large flowers, and hence low flower numbers (due to a negative genetic correlation between these two traits; Steven et al, 2007). Consequently, S. latifolia shows a strong sexual dimorphism for floral display size.…”
Section: The Costs Of Inbreedingmentioning
confidence: 99%