Advances in Morphometrics 1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-9083-2_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Dimorphism in the Craniofacial Skeleton of Modern Humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a Howells [46] b Not a traditionally defined landmark; the definition presented here was devised and is used by authors at the Centre for Forensic Science (UWA) c Bass [47] d Buikstra and Ubelaker [48] e DeVilliers [49] f Wood and Lynch [50] programme user's guide. In this software, the shape coordinates were obtained using a Procrustes superimposition of the original raw landmark configurations [17].…”
Section: Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a Howells [46] b Not a traditionally defined landmark; the definition presented here was devised and is used by authors at the Centre for Forensic Science (UWA) c Bass [47] d Buikstra and Ubelaker [48] e DeVilliers [49] f Wood and Lynch [50] programme user's guide. In this software, the shape coordinates were obtained using a Procrustes superimposition of the original raw landmark configurations [17].…”
Section: Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have revealed populational variations in sexual dimorphism and level of sexual expression in an assortment of skeletal traits (8,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). However, within-individual variation in sexual expression or dimorphism has not received equal attention, and at present, researchers can only offer tentative, theoretical answers to questions as simple as whether different skeletal areas of a single individual should be expected to display similar levels of sexual dimorphism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the causes of variation in biological populations, sexual dimorphism is one of the most conspicuous (Hanken and Hall, 1993;Plavcan, 1994;Wood and Lynch, 1996). However, the integrated nature of the phenotype, in addition to the large morphological variability detected within populations, makes it difficult to identify the causes that control the expression of these features, in particular those directly or indirectly related to sex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%