1966
DOI: 10.1177/00220345660450064301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Dimorphism in the Buccolingual Tooth Diameter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
37
2

Year Published

1968
1968
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
13
37
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some other studies have reported no sexual disparities for mesiodistal tooth width [38][39][40][41] . In relation to mesiodistal and buccolingual crown diameters, current study showed sexual disparities, which is consistent with published studies for various ethnic groups 9,11,[42][43][44][45]46) . Current study showed norms for diagonal crown diameters where male teeth were larger than female.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, some other studies have reported no sexual disparities for mesiodistal tooth width [38][39][40][41] . In relation to mesiodistal and buccolingual crown diameters, current study showed sexual disparities, which is consistent with published studies for various ethnic groups 9,11,[42][43][44][45]46) . Current study showed norms for diagonal crown diameters where male teeth were larger than female.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Regarding the difference in tooth size between men and women, MD and BL dimensions were smaller in females than males in almost all teeth, corroborating with previous studies [20,24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Except for the Kadena sample, which is the most dimorphic of the five Ryukyu Island groups, the present findings of the pattern of sexual dimorphism are roughly consistent with those reported so far (e.g. Garn et al, 1966Garn et al, , 1967a. It is far from obvious why the Kadena sample shows highly dimorphic dental features; however, it is well known that the degree of dimorphism in permanent dentition is variable in different population groups (Hillson, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…According to Garn et al (1964Garn et al ( , 1966, moreover, sexual dimorphism in mesiodistal crown diameters varied between 6% (canines) to 3% (incisors), with slightly higher figures for buccolingual dimorphism. Except for the Kadena sample, which is the most dimorphic of the five Ryukyu Island groups, the present findings of the pattern of sexual dimorphism are roughly consistent with those reported so far (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%