2013
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.12232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual dimorphism in scales of marbled flounder Pseudopleuronectes yokohamae (Pleuronectiformes: Pleuronectidae), with comments on the relevance to their spawning behaviour

Abstract: Variation of scales on the blind side of Pseudopleuronectes yokohamae in relation to sex, maturity and body size was examined. Immature males often have cycloid scales, while mature males have mostly ctenoid scales. Large females also often have ctenoid scales (but with fewer spines compared with males), and small females have mostly cycloid scales. The number of spines (ctenii) on the blind-side scale increases with body size in both sexes, indicating an ontogenetic change in scale morphology. As P. yokohamae… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ossicles of cottiforms, syngnathiforms, and gasterosteiforms have been characterized and differences in scale modifications of female and male specimens of the shorthorn sculpin documented in Märss et al (2010a, b) and Lees et al (2012). Variations in scales between sexes of different flatfishes have been documented by Norman (1934) and Tomiyama (2013). Batts (1964) ascertained the main morphological scale characteristics to distinguish the 15 species of flatfishes of Puget Sound, Washington.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ossicles of cottiforms, syngnathiforms, and gasterosteiforms have been characterized and differences in scale modifications of female and male specimens of the shorthorn sculpin documented in Märss et al (2010a, b) and Lees et al (2012). Variations in scales between sexes of different flatfishes have been documented by Norman (1934) and Tomiyama (2013). Batts (1964) ascertained the main morphological scale characteristics to distinguish the 15 species of flatfishes of Puget Sound, Washington.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sexual dimorphism in external morphology often poses challenges in species identification. Moreover, this characteristic complexity in external appearance frequently hinders precise species differentiation among flatfishes [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale types can also change even in a single individual during its life span (Able & Lamonaca, 2006; Norman, 1934; Roberts, 1993). The scale type and morphology also vary during the fish development, and also it depends on the fish size and sexes (Tomiyama, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%