2019
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Dimorphism in Immune Development and in Response to Nutritional Intervention in Neonatal Piglets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the elevated IgG titers against DT and TT up to D36 in the piglets suggest that B. bronchiseptica cross-reactive maternal antibodies are not the only explanation. Background IgG due to maternal antibodies and cross-reactive antibodies in piglets have been reported, and this could also explain the background levels observed in our study for specific pertussis and non-pertussis IgG titers (28).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Nevertheless, the elevated IgG titers against DT and TT up to D36 in the piglets suggest that B. bronchiseptica cross-reactive maternal antibodies are not the only explanation. Background IgG due to maternal antibodies and cross-reactive antibodies in piglets have been reported, and this could also explain the background levels observed in our study for specific pertussis and non-pertussis IgG titers (28).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Pigs were allotted in a randomized complete block design using sex and the initial BW as blocks in all measurements to account for the variation of the initial BW and sex dimorphism (30). The experimental unit was the pig, individually housed and fed.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, adult rats have been used to mimic the feasible impact of the fiber-enriched nutritional supplements tested herein on the immunological, hematological, and biochemical variables. Moreover, due to the disparity existing in the immune response, microbiota composition and the susceptibility to disease between gender [ 35 , 36 , 37 ], both female and male rats have been included in the present interventional study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%