2016
DOI: 10.5958/2394-2126.2016.00022.0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Dimorphism in Human Sacrum in Maharshtra Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corporobasal index: This index was more in females, however the difference was statistically insignificant. This was in contrast to Fawcett (1938) [30] (Whites & blacks), Davivongs, 1963 [20] (Australian Aborigines), Raju et al (1980) [37] (Varanasi), Ahankari & Ambali 2016 [38] 8 (Maharashtra) & Joshi et al, 2016 [16] (Maharashtra) who found the corporobasal index to be significantly more in males as compared to females [Table 5]. This discrepancy may be due to the smaller female sample size.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Corporobasal index: This index was more in females, however the difference was statistically insignificant. This was in contrast to Fawcett (1938) [30] (Whites & blacks), Davivongs, 1963 [20] (Australian Aborigines), Raju et al (1980) [37] (Varanasi), Ahankari & Ambali 2016 [38] 8 (Maharashtra) & Joshi et al, 2016 [16] (Maharashtra) who found the corporobasal index to be significantly more in males as compared to females [Table 5]. This discrepancy may be due to the smaller female sample size.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The results were consistent with that of previous studies. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] The sacral index has the authenticity of 95% with respect to determination of sex and there is existence of variations of sacral index values among different populations secondary to differences in sacral morphometric parameters. The sacral index values for male and female sacra derived from the present study were clearly in conformity with most studies as tabulated in Table 5 i.e., studies of Mishra SR 5 , Mazumdar S 7 , Janipati P 8 , Somesh MS 10 and Masih WF 12 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the use of pelvis morphometry in sexual dimorphism in dogs (Onodera et al, 1987;Sajjarengpong et al, 2003;Carrier, 2005;Nganvongpanit et al, 2017), there is no information about a sexual dimorphism related only to the sacrum similar to observed in humans. With the shape and morphometry, the sacrum has been the most commonly used bone, especially in humans (Ravalia and Wagh, 2015;Yadav et al, 2015;Ahankari and Ambali, 2016;Bajpai and Maiyyar, 2016;). In dogs, the assessments of this bone have been at a very limited level only in the pelvis studies (Onodera et al, 1987;Sajjarengpong et al, 2003;Carrier 2005;Nganvongpanit et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In dogs, the assessments of this bone have been at a very limited level only in the pelvis studies (Onodera et al, 1987;Sajjarengpong et al, 2003;Carrier 2005;Nganvongpanit et al, 2017). As being a component of the pelvis, it is a fact that this bone is effective to define sexual dimorphism similar to that in humans (Ravalia and Wagh, 2015;Yadav et al 2015;Ahankari and Ambali, 2016;Bajpai and Maiyyar, 2016). Sacrum in dogs has occurred through the constitution of three vertebrae (Evans and Christensen, 1979;Bahadır and Yıldız, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%