2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchb.2018.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual dimorphism in human facial expressions by 3D surface processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dissimilarities with those studies include that some were 2D, 23,24 some only examined subjects older than 20 years, [26][27][28][29][30][31] and none of them provided vectors of movement. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Only in two studies, the same expressions as in the current study were researched: the closed smile and pouting. 23,31 All other studies examined different facial exercises.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Dissimilarities with those studies include that some were 2D, 23,24 some only examined subjects older than 20 years, [26][27][28][29][30][31] and none of them provided vectors of movement. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Only in two studies, the same expressions as in the current study were researched: the closed smile and pouting. 23,31 All other studies examined different facial exercises.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a comparison between these studies and the current study is difficult to draw. Dissimilarities with those studies include that some were 2D, 23,24 some only examined subjects older than 20 years, 26–31 and none of them provided vectors of movement. 23–31 Only in two studies, the same expressions as in the current study were researched: the closed smile and pouting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While the FACS system has been extensively used with 2D dynamic faces displaying emotional expressions, for example, 2D images (Pantic and Rothkrantz, 2004;Cohn and De la Torre, 2014;Baltrušaitis et al, 2015) and 2D dynamic videos (Donato et al, 1999;Pantic and Rothkrantz, 2004;Bartlett et al, 2006) this study indicates 3D/4D dynamic faces may be more important for low intensity emotions. The FACS system has likewise achieved action unit detection in 3D facial videos or scans (Cosker et al, 2011) for successful emotion detection (Sun et al, 2008;Tsalakanidou and Malassiotis, 2010;Berretti et al, 2013;Reale et al, 2013;Tulyakov et al, 2015;Danelakis et al, 2018); and even more socially related morphologies such as dominance, trustworthiness and attractiveness (Gill et al, 2014) or the influences of ethnicity and gender on how we display emotional expressions differently from one another (Jack et al, 2014;Jandova and Urbanova, 2018).…”
Section: The Influence Of 4d Dynamic Movement In Building Facial Percmentioning
confidence: 99%