1993
DOI: 10.1139/z93-243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual dimorphism in cordylid lizards: a case study of the Drakensberg crag lizard, Pseudocordylus melanotus

Abstract: 1993. Sexual dimorphism in cordylid lizards: a case study of the Drakensberg crag lizard, Pseudocordylus melanotus. Can. J . Zool. 71: 17 15 -1723. In a high-altitude population of the Drakensberg crag lizard, Pseudocordylus melanotus, most adult males, unlike adult females, are brightly coloured, and they are larger in body size and have relatively larger heads than females. Three basic colour phases can be distinguished among the brightly coloured adult males. No apparent differences in reproductive activity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase of males' head size in sympatry could be explained if interspecific male-male combats take place or if access to females is restrained because of the presence of a closely related species. Although no behavioral studies are available for the populations in question, a bigger head is known to be advantageous in fights between male lizards (Fitch, 1981;Anderson and Vitt, 1990;Mouton and van Wyk, 1993;Perry et al, 2004) and the pattern observed could be the result of the presence of both conspecific and interspecific rivals when both species coexist. The absence of such morphological modifications in females does not contradict such a hypothesis, because there is no evidence for combats between female lizards, at least in these species (Carretero and Kaliontzopoulou, personal observation).…”
Section: Evidence For Sexual and Natural Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The increase of males' head size in sympatry could be explained if interspecific male-male combats take place or if access to females is restrained because of the presence of a closely related species. Although no behavioral studies are available for the populations in question, a bigger head is known to be advantageous in fights between male lizards (Fitch, 1981;Anderson and Vitt, 1990;Mouton and van Wyk, 1993;Perry et al, 2004) and the pattern observed could be the result of the presence of both conspecific and interspecific rivals when both species coexist. The absence of such morphological modifications in females does not contradict such a hypothesis, because there is no evidence for combats between female lizards, at least in these species (Carretero and Kaliontzopoulou, personal observation).…”
Section: Evidence For Sexual and Natural Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sexual dimorphism (SD) is a common trait in animals, most species being dimorphic rather than monomorphic (Schoener, 1977;Mouton and van Wyk, 1993;Andersson, 1994). Different evolutionary mechanisms have been proposed for the development of sexual dimorphism in various animal taxa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In lizards, heads are typically used as weapons in combats. Taxonomically widespread male-biased head size dimorphism (HSD) therefore probably reflects that head size apparently determines the outcome of direct physical aggressive encounters (Carothers, 1984;Vitt & Cooper, 1985;Vial & Stewart, 1989;Anderson & Vitt, 1990;Hews, 1990;Mouton & Wyk, 1993). Lizards also engage in a number of threat displays without physical combat or risk of injury, such as push-up displays or chemical signals (Martins, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sexual dichromatism, where males normally are the more brightly coloured sex, for example, illustrates the selective advantage that bright coloration may confer upon males possessing it in male-male interactions or in mate selection by females (Stamps 1983;Mouton & Van Wyk 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%