2010
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-53630-3.00004-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual differentiation of the human brain in relation to gender identity and sexual orientation

Abstract: SummaryDuring the intrauterine period the fetal brain develops in the male direction through a direct action of testosterone on the developing nerve cells, or in the female direction through the absence of this hormone surge. In this way, our gender identity (the conviction of belonging to the male or female gender) and sexual orientation are programmed into our brain structures when we are still in the womb. However, since sexual differentiation of the genitals takes place in the first two months of pregnancy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
1
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
77
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers focused on the organizing effect of prenatal sex steroid hormones and the key role of hypothalamus. They insisted that sexual orientation is determined during early development, as well as the physiological gender, and left little room for learning models of sexual orientation Rahman, 2005;Savic, Garcia-Falgueras, & Swaab, 2010;Swaab, 2004). However, their hypothesis is not compatible with the clinical data and genetic research findings (Davis et al, 1996;Friedman & Downey, 2010;Joel, 2011;Langstrom, Rahman, Carlstrom, & Lichtenstein, 2010), and our case presentation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some researchers focused on the organizing effect of prenatal sex steroid hormones and the key role of hypothalamus. They insisted that sexual orientation is determined during early development, as well as the physiological gender, and left little room for learning models of sexual orientation Rahman, 2005;Savic, Garcia-Falgueras, & Swaab, 2010;Swaab, 2004). However, their hypothesis is not compatible with the clinical data and genetic research findings (Davis et al, 1996;Friedman & Downey, 2010;Joel, 2011;Langstrom, Rahman, Carlstrom, & Lichtenstein, 2010), and our case presentation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Many researchers pointed to the third interstitial nucleus of the anterior hypothalamus, because it is 2.5 times larger in men than in women, and this volume difference in other mammals results from prenatal testosterone exposure (Herbert, 2008;Savic, Garcia-Falgueras, & Swaab, 2010). Moreover, patterns of cerebral asymmetry and functional brain connectivity/network are also linked to sexual orientation in men and women (Savic & Lindstrom, 2008;Corsello et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leading theories on the etiology of this condition involve a sex-atypical cerebral programming that diverges from the sexual differentiation of the rest of the body, postulated to reflect the organizational effects of altered levels of sex steroid hormones during a specific period of fetal development (Bao and Swaab, 2011;CohenKettenis and Gooren, 1999;Savic et al, 2010;Swaab, 2007). Some twin studies suggest a role for genetic factors in the development of GD, potentially involving polymorphisms in genes encoding elements of the sex steroid signaling or metabolic pathways (Heylens et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SDN is believed to be involved in the regulation of male sexual behaviour [74] although its precise role has not yet been determined. Interestingly, some studies also suggested SDN's role in a partner preference in rams [75] and even in humans [76], although differences in SDN volume between homosexual and heterosexual men were not confirmed by follow-up studies, and it is now accepted that SDN does not have a role in sexual orientation in humans (reviewed in [77]). …”
Section: Organizational Hormonal Effects On Structural Differences Inmentioning
confidence: 94%