2022
DOI: 10.4235/agmr.22.0093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Difference in Effect of Long Sleep Duration on Incident Sarcopenia after Two Years in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Abstract: Background: Sarcopenia, a progressive and generalized skeletal muscle disorder involving an accelerated loss of muscle mass and muscle function, is a common condition in older individuals. This study aimed to determine whether sleep latency and duration were independently associated with incident sarcopenia and to explore sex differences in these associations. Methods: This 2-year longitudinal analysis of cohort study data included community-dwelling participants of the 2016–2017 Korea Frailty and Aging Cohort… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(65 reference statements)
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggested that habitual long sleep duration in older adults is detrimental to muscle mass loss. This result was consistent with other longitudinal studies [ 19 , 20 ].A longitudinal study [ 21 ] of Chinese older adults found that both longer and shorter sleep duration were associated with muscle loss. The difference was that the study was conducted with older adults in rural and suburban China, whereas our study focused on community-based older adults in a large city.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This suggested that habitual long sleep duration in older adults is detrimental to muscle mass loss. This result was consistent with other longitudinal studies [ 19 , 20 ].A longitudinal study [ 21 ] of Chinese older adults found that both longer and shorter sleep duration were associated with muscle loss. The difference was that the study was conducted with older adults in rural and suburban China, whereas our study focused on community-based older adults in a large city.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The results vary from study to study due to different hormone levels, sample sizes, and definitions of muscle mass in different genders [ 29 ].However, current research generally recognizes men as a risk factor for muscle mass loss [ 30 32 ].When considering sleep duration as a factor, a systematic review concluded that longer sleep duration is more likely to be associated with sarcopenia in older adults, especially women [ 33 ]. In contrast, another longitudinal study [ 20 ] showed that long sleep duration was associated with low muscle mass only in community-based male older adults. The reason for the inconsistency with previous findings may be that most of the participants in our study were women, and although the onset and rate of muscle mass loss in men is earlier than that in women, changes in hormone levels [ 5 , 34 ] due to menopause in women accelerate bone loss and muscle decay, and female older adults instead lose more muscle mass in later life [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have reported gender differences in the relationship between sleep duration and the incidence of sarcopenia 11 15 48. In our study, we found a significant association between both shorter and longer sleep durations in men and an increased likelihood of possible sarcopenia; however, no such association was observed among women.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Our effort in this study may further explain connection of extreme sleep duration and neurological dysfunction. Interestingly, our results showed that overlong sleep duration in male caused higher level sNfL than female might out of the poorer sleep in male [ 54 ]. Also, our data showed that people with normal BMI may get worsen neuro-stage, might traced back that obesity is chronical inflammatory state caused elevated sNfL level same as diabetes group [ 55 , 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%