1994
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1994.1084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual competition and courtship disruptions: why do male bowerbirds destroy each other's bowers?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bower destruction rates at Taunton were around 20 times lower than those reported at Bullamon Plains (Borgia 1995a), averaging 0.0013/day in 1998 and 0.0014/day in 1999 (Madden 2002). One explanation for variation in destruction rate across species and populations is the variation in interbower distances, with the prediction that marauding may increase in profitability and occurrence as interbower distance decreases (Pruett‐Jones & Pruett‐Jones 1994, Hunter & Dwyer 1997). However, bowers at Taunton were almost twice as close to each other as those at Bullamon Plains.…”
Section: Materials Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bower destruction rates at Taunton were around 20 times lower than those reported at Bullamon Plains (Borgia 1995a), averaging 0.0013/day in 1998 and 0.0014/day in 1999 (Madden 2002). One explanation for variation in destruction rate across species and populations is the variation in interbower distances, with the prediction that marauding may increase in profitability and occurrence as interbower distance decreases (Pruett‐Jones & Pruett‐Jones 1994, Hunter & Dwyer 1997). However, bowers at Taunton were almost twice as close to each other as those at Bullamon Plains.…”
Section: Materials Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the manipulation did affect other events occurring at the bower, speci cally increasing the number and duration of destruction events at bowers with supplemented berries. Such destruction events, common in several bowerbird species including spotted bowerbirds, act to reduce the overall quality of the bower and are generally carried out by other bower owners (Borgia 1985a;Borgia & Mueller 1992;Pruett-Jones & Pruett-Jones 1994). Studies of several other species of bowerbirds have shown that an anthropomorphic measure of bower quality is related to mating success (Borgia 1985a;Borgia & Mueller 1992;Lenz 1994;Uy & Borgia 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If male quality is correlated with stealing ability, then individual differences in the numbers of decorations at bowers, brought about by differences in male stealing behaviours, may allow females to identify highquality mates. Though theoretical models suggest that decoration theft and bower destruction are evolutionarily stable strategies in comparison with the alternative strategy of bower guarding (Pruett-Jones and Pruett-Jones 1994), the frequency of decoration theft appears to be highly variable both within and among species (Borgia and Gore 1986;Borgia and Mueller 1992;Hunter and Dwyer 1997;reviewed in Frith and Frith 2004), and this may affect the relationship between male-male competition and signal honesty (Borgia and Mueller 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%