2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-308x(04)57002-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual Biology of Schistosomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 274 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show thus, for the first time, that multiple infections by only male schistosomes induced a protective effect to reinfection by males and that multiple infections by only female schistosomes did not induce a protective effect to reinfection by females. Some of the results obtained in the literature also showed that protection by male parasite is higher than by female parasite: In the synthesis of Dean (1983), Table V, on the 18 results showing a reduction of more than 20%, 12 were obtained from male primo-infections and only 6 from female ones; in the synthesis of Moné and Boissier (2004), Table II, on the 17 results showing a reduction of more than 20%, 12 were obtained from male primo-infections and only 5 from female ones. The difference between male and female protectivities could originate from the higher inflammatory reaction induced by males compared to females in unisexual infections (Boissier et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results show thus, for the first time, that multiple infections by only male schistosomes induced a protective effect to reinfection by males and that multiple infections by only female schistosomes did not induce a protective effect to reinfection by females. Some of the results obtained in the literature also showed that protection by male parasite is higher than by female parasite: In the synthesis of Dean (1983), Table V, on the 18 results showing a reduction of more than 20%, 12 were obtained from male primo-infections and only 6 from female ones; in the synthesis of Moné and Boissier (2004), Table II, on the 17 results showing a reduction of more than 20%, 12 were obtained from male primo-infections and only 5 from female ones. The difference between male and female protectivities could originate from the higher inflammatory reaction induced by males compared to females in unisexual infections (Boissier et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The protective effect of unisexual male or female trickle infections on mice has never been tested. Certainly, the fact that a mass unisexual infection is unable to induce a convincing protective effect (see Moné and Boissier 2004 for review) did not stimulate such experiments. However, it has been shown that trickle infections stimulated greater resistance than single infection (Farah et al 1997) and, more recently, that unisexual male schistosome infection induced a stronger inflammatory response compared to female (Boissier et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weak positive signals were scattered throughout parenchyma, rather than constrained within certain organ(s), as the case in S. mansoni (Ribeiro-paes and Rodrigues 1995). TYR activity has been known to be linked uniquely to egg production in trematodes (Johnson et al 1987), and therefore, the activity in male worms may be explained by the partial hermaphroditism in schistosomes (Atkinson and Atkinson 1980;Moné and Boissier 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sex ratio of acanthocephalan and nematode parasites is frequently biased towards females in both natural and experimental infections (Poulin, 1997), while that of schistosomes is typically male-biased (Mone and Boissier, 2004). The primary sex ratio of animals is expected to be balanced (Fisher, 1930) but later events such as differential survival and infection rates may result in biased sex ratios of parasites within hosts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%