2013
DOI: 10.1186/1752-1505-7-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexual and gender-based violence in areas of armed conflict: a systematic review of mental health and psychosocial support interventions

Abstract: BackgroundSexual and other forms of gender-based violence are common in conflict settings and are known risk factors for mental health and psychosocial wellbeing. We present findings from a systematic review of the academic and grey literature focused on the effectiveness of mental health and psychosocial support interventions for populations exposed to sexual and other forms of gender-based violence in the context of armed conflicts.MethodsWe searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
79
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(37 reference statements)
3
79
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the severe health and social burden associated with CRSV, virtually no evidence exists on how medical, mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) interventions work for men, boys and LGBT survivors of CRSV. One realist review was conducted on female CRSV [34], and two systematic reviews on CRSV interventions have been carried out [35,36]. However, male and LGBT survivors were either not explicitly considered, or due to the lack of specific quantitative studies on these groups, did not allow for inclusion in the systematic reviews.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the severe health and social burden associated with CRSV, virtually no evidence exists on how medical, mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) interventions work for men, boys and LGBT survivors of CRSV. One realist review was conducted on female CRSV [34], and two systematic reviews on CRSV interventions have been carried out [35,36]. However, male and LGBT survivors were either not explicitly considered, or due to the lack of specific quantitative studies on these groups, did not allow for inclusion in the systematic reviews.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few psychological interventions targeting survivors of GBV in LMIC have undergone rigorous scientific evaluation and therefore their efficacy and effectiveness remain indeterminate [5, 13]. One randomized controlled trial conducted by Bass and colleagues [14] investigated the effectiveness of group cognitive processing therapy (CPT), a trauma-focused psychological intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most promising research is emerging from conflict settings where adaptation of CBT have shown promise with hope that such interventions are not impossible in poor resource settings with high prevalence of rape. 28 Another challenge is the low levels of mental health literacy and capacity among service providers. This may have contributed to the poor response and recognition of survivor's mental health needs as well as an understanding of how their interactions impact on survivors' mental health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%