1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf01874138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexing ofin vitro-fertilized preimplantation mouse embryos by the PCR method

Abstract: SummaryThe applicability of the dual PCR method to embryo sexing was examined with the aim of establishing a noninvasive method of preimplantation diagnosis for human genetic disorders. Mouse pre-embryos obtained by in vitro fertilization were studied. The Sry gene sequence and the myogenin sequence were amplified as the Y-specific and internal control sequences, respectively. Amplification of as little as 10 pg of mouse genomic DNA was possible with the dual PCR method, the sensitivity being 10-fold greater t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Successful assays are simple, need small amount of tissue, and are accurate during the entire pregnancy. Measuring the activity of X chromosomelinked enzymes [60] or RNA-based PCRs is complicated by the presence of some gene products only at certain developmental stages [61]. However, this problem is not present when the test is based on DNA (see Table 2).…”
Section: Genetic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful assays are simple, need small amount of tissue, and are accurate during the entire pregnancy. Measuring the activity of X chromosomelinked enzymes [60] or RNA-based PCRs is complicated by the presence of some gene products only at certain developmental stages [61]. However, this problem is not present when the test is based on DNA (see Table 2).…”
Section: Genetic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sexing was performed using their tails by analyzing the Sry gene at the Y-chromosome-specific target and the myogenin gene as a control by the dual polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method, according to Yano (1993) and Hayashi et al (2011).…”
Section: Sexing Checkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic methods have the advantage of being less time consuming in certain situations (use of noninvasive samples instead of laborious tracking down of the animal), require smaller samples, are easier to perform, and can be noninvasive (e.g., hair). In the field of embryo sexing, many implant sexing techniques, such as karyotyping (Yano, 1993), are limited by the lack of material, while molecular assays need as little as a single blastomere (Tsai et al., 2011). Measuring the activity of X chromosome‐linked enzymes (Yano, 1993) or RNA‐based PCRs is further complicated by the presence of some gene products only at certain developmental stages (Prantner, Ord, Medvedev, & Gerton, 2016); this problem is not present when the test is based on the DNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of embryo sexing, many implant sexing techniques, such as karyotyping (Yano, 1993), are limited by the lack of material, while molecular assays need as little as a single blastomere (Tsai et al., 2011). Measuring the activity of X chromosome‐linked enzymes (Yano, 1993) or RNA‐based PCRs is further complicated by the presence of some gene products only at certain developmental stages (Prantner, Ord, Medvedev, & Gerton, 2016); this problem is not present when the test is based on the DNA. Furthermore, embryo freezing is not needed (contrary to in situ hybridization), reducing the chance of freezing‐induced damage (Mara et al., 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%