Sex worker-led structural interventions in India: A case study on addressing violence in HIV prevention through the Ashodaya Samithi collective in Mysore

Abstract

Background & objectives:Structural interventions have the capacity to improve the outcomes of HIV/AIDS interventions by changing the social, economic, political or environmental factors that determine risk and vulnerability. Marginalized groups face disproportionate barriers to health, and sex workers are among those at highest risk of HIV in India. Evidence in India and globally has shown that sex workers face violence in many forms ranging from verbal, psychological and emotional abuse to economic extortion, physical and sexual violence and this is directly linked to lower levels of condom use and higher levels of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), the most critical determinants of HIV risk. We present here a case study of an intervention that mobilized sex workers to lead an HIV prevention response that addresses violence in their daily lives.Methods:This study draws on ethnographic research and project monitoring data from a community-led structural intervention in Mysore, India, implemented by Ashodaya Samithi. Qualitative and quantitative data were used to characterize baseline conditions, community responses and subsequent outcomes related to violence.Results:In 2004, the incidence of reported violence by sex workers was extremely high (> 8 incidents per sex worker, per year) but decreased by 84 per cent over 5 years. Violence by police and anti-social elements, initially most common, decreased substantially after a safe space was established for sex workers to meet and crisis management and advocacy were initiated with different stakeholders. Violence by clients, decreased after working with lodge owners to improve safety. However, initial increases in intimate partner violence were reported, and may be explained by two factors: (i) increased willingness to report such incidents; and (ii) increased violence as a reaction to sex workers’ growing empowerment. Trafficking was addressed through the establishment of a self-regulatory board (SRB). The community's progressive response to violence was enabled by advancing community mobilization, ensuring community ownership of the intervention, and shifting structural vulnerabilities, whereby sex workers increasingly engaged key actors in support of a more enabling environment.Interpretation & conclusions:Ashodaya's community-led response to violence at multiple levels proved highly synergistic and effective in reducing structural violence.

Social Construct of Sex Work in India: Implications for HIV Prevention

“…FSWs conceal their sex work to ensure their personal safety. Literature indicates that personal safety is jeopardized by challenging power dynamics with FSW's domestic partners (Reza-Paul et al, 2012). This inverse relationship between empowerment and domestic violence is clearly evident in our finding.…”

Test and treat: the early experiences in a clinic serving women at high risk of HIV infection in Kampala

“…Many women need appropriate support as they contemplate starting ART. Peer-led approaches have already been documented as being very helpful in interventions with sex workers (Reza-Paul et al, 2012) and these could be further enhanced to offer support for the implementation of the new guidance on prompt treatment, as well as continued efforts by clinic staff to support and reassure women initiating treatment.…”

Circumstances, experiences and processes surrounding women's entry into sex work in India

“…In addition to elevating risk of HIV/STIs, structural (social, political, cultural, economic, environmental) factors disproportionately impact sex workers through violence (emotional, physical, psychological, structural), power inequalities, social inequities, silenced voices and restricted agency (Dandona et al 2006;Gurnani et al 2011;Reza-Paul et al 2012). Structural interventions involving community mobilisation, collectivisation, and empowerment are known to improve access to HIV-related health services and reduce structural vulnerabilities faced by sex workers in India (Beattie et al 2012;Blanchard et al 2005;Gurnani et al 2011).…”