2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex steroid hormone receptors in bladder cancer: Usefulness in differential diagnosis and implications in histogenesis of bladder cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, it may explain why the differential diagnostic efficacy of the relative enhancement CT value in the arterial phase was superior to the other indicators in comprehensive consideration of the AUC, specificity, and sensitivity performance. Previous studies have also suggested that measurement of the expression of hormone receptors such as estrogen receptor alpha may assist in the diagnosis of primary bladder cancer [ 18 ]. However, such measurements are not in widespread use because of susceptibility to differences in experimental procedures and interobserver variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it may explain why the differential diagnostic efficacy of the relative enhancement CT value in the arterial phase was superior to the other indicators in comprehensive consideration of the AUC, specificity, and sensitivity performance. Previous studies have also suggested that measurement of the expression of hormone receptors such as estrogen receptor alpha may assist in the diagnosis of primary bladder cancer [ 18 ]. However, such measurements are not in widespread use because of susceptibility to differences in experimental procedures and interobserver variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive rate of ERa expression in urothelial tumors ranged from 0% to 38% (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)36). ERa expression was shown to be significantly down-regulated in tumors, compared with non-tumors, in three studies (22,26,36), while the positivity was even lower, with no statistical significance, in non-tumors in other three studies (17,23,28).…”
Section: Expression Of Er In Surgical Specimensmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Two studies (17,18) showed significant up-regulation of ERa expression in grade 3 tumors (vs. grade 1-2 tumors), whereas the down-regulation in high-grade tumors was reported in at least four of the other studies (no statistical significance in three of them) (16,22,26,36). Similarly, compared with lower stage tumors, both significant (16,18) or marginal (27) up-regulation and significant down-regulation (20,22) in higher stage tumors, such as muscle-invasive bladder cancer, were observed. However, there were no significant associations of ERa expression with patient outcomes (17,20,22,24,26,28,36).…”
Section: Expression Of Er In Surgical Specimensmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The expression of ERα and ERβ has been immunohistochemically compared in bladder cancer specimens versus corresponding benign tissues ( Table 1). The rates of ERα positivity were shown to be significantly higher in non-neoplastic urothelium than in tumor [11], while other studies showed no significant differences in ERα expression between non-neoplastic and neoplastic tissues [12,22]. Our recent meta-analysis of immunohistochemical studies in bladder specimens also revealed a significant difference in ERα expression between non-tumor and tumor (p < 0.001) [15].…”
Section: Ersmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Immunohistochemical studies showed the rates of PR positivity were <5% and 13-16% in bladder and UUT specimens, and their differences between non-neoplastic urothelium and urothelial tumor were not statistically significant [12,13,22] (Table 1). However, no functional studies of PR signals in urothelial cancer have been reported, except for recent analysis of microarray datasets showing that PR gene was differentially expressed in normal urothelial tissues versus urothelial carcinomas [56].…”
Section: Prmentioning
confidence: 99%