1986
DOI: 10.1080/0140528860080206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex‐stereotyped attitudes about science: can they be changed?

Abstract: This paper describes and discusses some attitudes about science held by a group of ten-yearold children in Western Australia. It reports the results of two questionnaires administered to the children before and after their teachers participated in an in-service programme, one of the aims of which was to reduce sex stereotyping of science. It is found that the children's attitudes about science became less sex-stereotyped. The findings emphasize the importance of the influence of teachers' science-related attit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although societal sex-role stereotyping of appropriate behaviors and careers is pervasive, recent studies suggest that science teachers and appropriate classroom environments may have an ameliorating effect (Kahle, 1988;Parker & Rennie, 1986;Talton & Simpson, 1986). According to Shibeci and Riley (1986), what teachers do in the classroom affects student attitudes and achievement levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although societal sex-role stereotyping of appropriate behaviors and careers is pervasive, recent studies suggest that science teachers and appropriate classroom environments may have an ameliorating effect (Kahle, 1988;Parker & Rennie, 1986;Talton & Simpson, 1986). According to Shibeci and Riley (1986), what teachers do in the classroom affects student attitudes and achievement levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, analysis of the literature suggests that achievement can be affected by a range of factors including motivation, attitude, interest, confidence, classroom environments, types of schools (single-sex and coeducational), and social stereotypes (Jones & Wheatley, 1990;Kahle, 1987;Klein, 1985;Parker & Rennie, 1986;~Young, 1991;Young & Fraser, 1994). Within the personal realm, confidence and self esteem are two obscure factors likely to affect subject selection in science.…”
Section: Category 1: Personalmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For some years, educational research has been increasingly preoccupied with problems faced by female pupils in approaching scientific subjects (Bentley and Watts 1986, Parker and Rennie 1986, Pennick and Yager 1986, Hacker 1986). This increasing focus carries with it, whatever internal disagreements there may be about the role of gender conditioning, or the importance of male or female teachers as role models in the science class, a shared pre-supposition that the relationship between science and femininity is problematic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%