2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex-specific response strategies in mental rotation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study found that the exponent values were larger overall for females than for males, suggesting that females were less reliant on a mental rotation strategy to decide if rotated objects would face to the left or to the right when imagined at the upright. This finding is consistent with research suggesting that strategy differences exist on mental rotation tasks when comparing the performances of males and females (Butler et al, 2006;Heil & Jansen-Osmann, 2008;Hirnstein, Bayer, & Hausmann, 2009). While these sex difference findings are interesting, they are presented with caution as the group sizes were small when comparing the parameters of males and females.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The current study found that the exponent values were larger overall for females than for males, suggesting that females were less reliant on a mental rotation strategy to decide if rotated objects would face to the left or to the right when imagined at the upright. This finding is consistent with research suggesting that strategy differences exist on mental rotation tasks when comparing the performances of males and females (Butler et al, 2006;Heil & Jansen-Osmann, 2008;Hirnstein, Bayer, & Hausmann, 2009). While these sex difference findings are interesting, they are presented with caution as the group sizes were small when comparing the parameters of males and females.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Also, a significant main effect was found of gender, F(1, 1) = 553.5, p = .03. Male participants performed better than the female participants, which is in line with other research 23 . See Table 4 for an overview of the mean accuracy of estimating the spatial layout of the SE.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Also, a significant main effect was found of gender, F(1, 1) = 553.5, p = .03. Male participants performed better than the female participants, which is in line with other research (Hirnstein, Bayer, & Hausmann, 2009). See Table 4 for an overview of the mean accuracy of estimating the spatial layout of the SE.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%