Development of Responsiveness to Steroid Hormones 1980
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-024940-7.50032-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex-Specific Orientation in Female and Male Rats: Development and Effects of Early Endocrine Manipulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned already, numerous experiments (Bakker et al, 1993;Baum et al, 1990;de Jonge et al, 1988;Johnson and Tiefer, 1972;Meyerson et al, 1978) have explored the contribution of organizational actions of testosterone and/or of estradiol to the differentiation of circuits that control sex partner preference and mate recognition in the male. An alternative explanation of hardwired sex differences in brain circuits that control social behavior, including the processing of pheromones, involves direct neural actions of genes expressed off either the X and/or Y chromosome during development (McCarthy and Arnold, 2011).…”
Section: Role Of Sex Chromosome Genes In Odor Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned already, numerous experiments (Bakker et al, 1993;Baum et al, 1990;de Jonge et al, 1988;Johnson and Tiefer, 1972;Meyerson et al, 1978) have explored the contribution of organizational actions of testosterone and/or of estradiol to the differentiation of circuits that control sex partner preference and mate recognition in the male. An alternative explanation of hardwired sex differences in brain circuits that control social behavior, including the processing of pheromones, involves direct neural actions of genes expressed off either the X and/or Y chromosome during development (McCarthy and Arnold, 2011).…”
Section: Role Of Sex Chromosome Genes In Odor Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, even the ovary may be active (Do Èhler & Wuttke, 1975), the absence of gonadal steroid hormones reaching the central nervous system during early development, produce typical female characteristics (Beach, 1976). Conversely, the administration of aromatizable androgens (Luttge & Whalen, 1970) to immature females completely alters their reproductive physiology: females showed no ovarian nor gonadotropin cyclicity with delayed or absent vaginal opening (Swanson & van der Werff ten Bosch, 1964), suppression of lordotic behavior accompanied by a higher incidence of mounting (male sexual behavior) (DeJonge, Muntjewerff, Louwerse, & van de Poll, 1988), a behavioral repertoire similar to that of male subjects (Meyerson, Eliasson, & Hetta, 1980), brain anatomy with male characteristics (Handa, Corbier, Shryne, Schoonmaker, & Gorski, 1985) with larger granule cell layer (Roof & Havens, 1992), and size of CA1 and CA3 pyramidal cells (Isgor & Sengelaub, 1998) and higher GABA levels (Davis, Ward, Selmanoff, Herbison, & McCarthy, 1999). Importantly, also a virilized EEG, characterized by higher theta RP and lower delta and beta RP, may be produced in females prenatally treated with androgens (Jua Ârez et al, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, examination of a female rat exposed to a sexually active male can easily assess her sexual receptivity. Sexual motivation is somewhat more difficult to investigate; however, tentatively, this aspect of sexual behavior may be reflected by the time spent by a female rat in the vicinity of a male rather than a female, or elsewhere (Meyerson et al 1978;Vega Matuszczyk and Larsson 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, examination of a female rat exposed to a sexually active male can easily assess her sexual receptivity. Sexual motivation is somewhat more difficult to investigate; however, tentatively, this aspect of sexual behavior may be reflected by the time spent by a female rat in the vicinity of a male rather than a female, or elsewhere (Meyerson et al 1978;Vega Matuszczyk and Larsson 1993).In the present study, the extent to which the sexual side effects induced by SRIs in women can be mirrored in animal experiments was addressed; to this end, we investigated the effect of subchronic administration of the selective SRI fluoxetine (Fuller et al 1991) on various aspects of female sexual behavior. In the first experiment, the effects of 1 to 3 weeks of fluoxetine administration on sexual receptivity in the estrous phase of normally cycling animals was studied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%