2013
DOI: 10.1177/194008291300600504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex-Specific Flowering Patterns and Demography of the Understorey Rain Forest Tree Iryanthera Hostmannii (Myristicaceae)

Abstract: Sexual dimorphism in dioecious plants is a common phenomenon that has received widespread attention, yet the implications for reproductive function and fitness remain poorly understood. Using data from a long-term study of a population of 839 dioecious Iryanthera hostmannii (Myristicaceae 'nutmeg') trees in a large permanent plot in a lowland tropical rain forest, we examined the effects of greater investment in reproduction by females compared to males for various aspects of life history. Although male trees … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In dioecious species a big exposition of male flowers and the chick-pollen is related to the increase in the flowering time BAWA, 1981;MUNGUIA-ROSAS et al, 2011), thus increasing the pollination capacity (QUEENBOROUGH et al, 2013;MATSUHISA;USHIMARU, 2015), while females only need the period necessary to receive the pollen grain to ensure the production of seeds (OTÁROLA et al, 2013), presenting shorter and more intense capacity (MATSUHISA; USHIMARU, 2015) The flowering in dioecious individuals tends to present distinct occurrence time between male plants and female plants (MUNGUIA-ROSAS et al, 2011;MATSUHISA;USHIMARU, 2015). The female flowering is delayed and synchronized with the peak intensity of male plants and an earlier male flowering was associated with the competition among individuals of the population for greater dispersal of gametes and consequently, their characters (BULLOCK; BAWA, 1981;GRANT, 1995;MUNGUIA-ROSAS et al, 2011;QUEENBOROUGH et al, 2013;MATSUHISA;USHIMARU, 2015). Female flowers support longer flowering cycle, maintaining a longer lasting bloom in relation to male flowering (ESPÍRITO-SANTO et al, 2003;MATSUHISA;USHIMARU, 2015), explained by the need for longer visits by pollinators.…”
Section: Reproductive Phenologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In dioecious species a big exposition of male flowers and the chick-pollen is related to the increase in the flowering time BAWA, 1981;MUNGUIA-ROSAS et al, 2011), thus increasing the pollination capacity (QUEENBOROUGH et al, 2013;MATSUHISA;USHIMARU, 2015), while females only need the period necessary to receive the pollen grain to ensure the production of seeds (OTÁROLA et al, 2013), presenting shorter and more intense capacity (MATSUHISA; USHIMARU, 2015) The flowering in dioecious individuals tends to present distinct occurrence time between male plants and female plants (MUNGUIA-ROSAS et al, 2011;MATSUHISA;USHIMARU, 2015). The female flowering is delayed and synchronized with the peak intensity of male plants and an earlier male flowering was associated with the competition among individuals of the population for greater dispersal of gametes and consequently, their characters (BULLOCK; BAWA, 1981;GRANT, 1995;MUNGUIA-ROSAS et al, 2011;QUEENBOROUGH et al, 2013;MATSUHISA;USHIMARU, 2015). Female flowers support longer flowering cycle, maintaining a longer lasting bloom in relation to male flowering (ESPÍRITO-SANTO et al, 2003;MATSUHISA;USHIMARU, 2015), explained by the need for longer visits by pollinators.…”
Section: Reproductive Phenologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a process requires both the synchronization of flowering phenology and the presence of pollinators, which could lead to uncertainty on seed production and tree regeneration. The uncertainty is even greater because the sex ratio of dioecious species is malefavored (Queenborough et al 2009;Gao et al 2012), and male flowers bloom earlier than their female opposites at certain species (Queenborough et al 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results also revealed variations in period of flower bud initiating and opening between provenances. The earlier flowering in males of S. birrea is associated with the competition among individuals of the population for greater dispersal of gametes while delayed flowering in females enabled them to synchronize with males at the peak of their flowering intensity for increased pollination [10,23,24]. The longer period from bud to anthesis in males suggest that males requires longer period for pollen development for increased pollination capacity while females need shorter period for pollen reception to ensure seed set [24].…”
Section: -2-differences Between Males and Females In Days From Bud Smentioning
confidence: 99%